Literature DB >> 1919061

Application of intravascular ultrasound for detection and quantitation of coronary atherosclerosis.

S E Nissen1, J C Gurley.   

Abstract

Although angiography is widely utilized to assess the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), arteriography yields only a silhouette of the vessel lumen. Coronary intravascular ultrasound supplements angiography by providing a tomographic perspective of lumen geometry and vessel wall structure. Intracoronary ultrasound can now be performed in vivo utilizing small, flexible probes capable of negotiating tortuous vessels. We have performed coronary ultrasound in more than 100 patients, including a group of normal subjects, with no serious complications. Measurements of coronary lumen dimensions by angiography and ultrasound correlated closely for normal vessels (r = 0.92) and for concentrically narrowed atherosclerotic vessels (r = 0.90). However, the correlation between angiography and ultrasound was only fair for eccentrically narrowed arteries (r = 0.79) and was poor following angioplasty (r = 0.30). Coronary artery wall motion was measured by intravascular ultrasound and demonstrated significant differences between normal arteries (18% lumen area change) and atherosclerotic vessels (11% change). Coronary ultrasound demonstrated important differences in the structure of normal and atherosclerotic vessel walls. Arteries in normal subjects exhibited a thin intimal leading-edge echo (mean 0.20 mm) and subadjacent sonolucent zone (mean 0.12 mm). Atherosclerotic vessels typically demonstrated increased thickness of both structures and often exhibited dense fibrocalcific plaques that shadowed underlying anatomy. These ultrasound abnormalities were often present at angiographically normal sites. Several limitations of coronary intravascular ultrasound were apparent, including echo 'dropout', distortions produced by non-coaxial imaging, and inability to image small or severely narrowed vessels. Coronary intravascular ultrasound holds great promise for the detection and quantification of CAD in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1919061     DOI: 10.1007/bf01797849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  19 in total

1.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; W D Edwards; C A Warnes; G S Reeder; D R Holmes; A J Tajik; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study.

Authors:  E J Gussenhoven; C E Essed; C T Lancée; F Mastik; P Frietman; F C van Egmond; J Reiber; H Bosch; H van Urk; J Roelandt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  C M Grondin; I Dyrda; A Pasternac; L Campeau; M G Bourassa; J Lespérance
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen.

Authors:  Z Vlodaver; R Frech; R A Van Tassel; J E Edwards
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic--histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients.

Authors:  J M Isner; J Kishel; K M Kent; J A Ronan; A M Ross; W C Roberts
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability.

Authors:  J E Galbraith; M L Murphy; N de Soyza
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  B N Potkin; A L Bartorelli; J M Gessert; R F Neville; Y Almagor; W C Roberts; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?

Authors:  C W White; C B Wright; D B Doty; L F Hiratza; C L Eastham; D G Harrison; M L Marcus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-03-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings.

Authors:  E N Arnett; J M Isner; D R Redwood; K M Kent; W P Baker; H Ackerstein; W C Roberts
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The accuracy of arteriography and ultrasound imaging for atherosclerosis measurement. A review.

Authors:  D H Blankenhorn; P J Curry
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.534

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reliability of mechanical and phased-array designs for serial intravascular ultrasound examinations--animal and clinical studies in stented and non-stented coronary arteries.

Authors:  J C Tardif; O F Bertrand; R Mongrain; J Lespérance; J Grégoire; P Paiement; R Bonan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-10

2.  A pan-coronary artery angiographic study of the association between diabetes mellitus and progression or regression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Raisuke Iijima; Gjin Ndrepepa; Vivien Kujath; Yukinori Harada; Sebastian Kufner; Heribert Schunkert; Masato Nakamura; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.