Literature DB >> 7471365

Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic--histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients.

J M Isner, J Kishel, K M Kent, J A Ronan, A M Ross, W C Roberts.   

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of coronary angiography in identifying severe narrowing of the left main coronary artery (LMCA), the degree of narrowing observed by angiography was compared to that observed at necropsy in 28 patients with symptomatic coronary heart disease in whom angiography had been performed within 40 days of death. The angiograms were evaluated independently by three experienced angiographers. In 20 of the 28 patients (71%), the degree of narrowing of the LMCA was either underestimated (13 patients) or overestimated (10 patients) by two or three of three angiographers; of 84 angiographic judgments made by the three angiographers in the 28 patients, 54 (64%) were underestimates (33 judgments, 39%) or overestimates (21 judgments, 25%) of the degree of LMCA narrowing. Of 12 LMCAs narrowed 76-100% in cross-sectional area at necropsy, six were underestimated at preoperative angiography by two or three of three angiographers; of 12 LMCAs narrowed 51-75% in cross-sectional area at necropsy, all 12 were either under- or overestimated angiographically by two or three of three angiographers; of four LMCAs narrowed 26-50% in cross-section at necropsy, two were overestimated by two of three angiographers. Thus, angiographic determination of degrees of narrowing of the LMCA during life is subject to considerable error. The angiographic errors appear to have resulted primarily from the presence of atherosclerotic plaque in the LMCA and an insufficient number of angiographic projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7471365     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.63.5.1056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

1.  Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G J Bech; H Droste; N H Pijls; B De Bruyne; J J Bonnier; H R Michels; K H Peels; J J Koolen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-26

Review 3.  [Progression and regression of atherosclerotic plaques. New results based on intracoronary ultrasound].

Authors:  Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Comparison of X-ray fluoroscopy and interventional magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of coronary artery stenoses in swine.

Authors:  Jordin D Green; Reed A Omary; Brian E Schirf; Richard Tang; Biao Lu; James A Gehl; J Jenny Huang; James C Carr; F Scott Pereles; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  William Clifford Roberts, MD: an interview by W. Bruce Fye, MD.

Authors:  William C Roberts; W Bruce Fye
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

6.  Angiography underestimates peripheral atherosclerosis: lumenography revisited.

Authors:  Vikram S Kashyap; Mircea L Pavkov; Paul D Bishop; Sean P Nassoiy; Matthew J Eagleton; Daniel G Clair; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Use of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasonography to evaluate ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Harvinder Arora; William Posligua; Andrés Mesa
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of peripheral arteries as an adjunct to balloon angioplasty and atherectomy.

Authors:  Y Korogi; T Hirai; M Takahashi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Quantitative coronary arterial stenosis assessment by multidetector CT and invasive coronary angiography for identifying patients with myocardial perfusion abnormalities.

Authors:  G K Godoy; A Vavere; J M Miller; H Chahal; H Niinuma; P Lemos; J Hoe; N Paul; M E Clouse; C D Ramos; J A Lima; A Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Quantitative comparison of coronary artery flow and myocardial perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the presence and absence of recent cocaine use.

Authors:  Jim Edward Weber; Judd E Hollander; Sabina A Murphy; Eugene Braunwald; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.