Literature DB >> 19190360

A high-sensitivity small animal SPECT system.

Gregory S Mitchell1, Simon R Cherry.   

Abstract

Medical imaging using single gamma-ray-emitting radionuclides typically makes use of parallel hole collimators or pinholes in order to achieve good spatial resolution. However, a tradeoff in sensitivity is inherent in the use of a collimator, and modern preclinical single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems detect a very small fraction of emitted gamma rays, often less than 0.1%. A system for small animal SPECT imaging which uses no collimators could potentially achieve very high sensitivity-several tens of percent-with reasonably sized detectors. This would allow two significant improvements in preclinical studies: images could be obtained more rapidly, allowing higher throughput for screening applications, or for dynamic processes to be observed with very good time resolution; and images could be obtained with less radioactive tracer, making possible the in vivo imaging of low-capacity receptor systems, aiding research into new tracer compounds, and reducing the cost and easing the regulatory burden of an experiment. Of course, a system with no collimator will not be able to approach the submillimeter spatial resolutions produced by the most advanced pinhole and collimated systems, but a high-sensitivity system with resolution of order 1 cm could nonetheless find significant and new use in the many molecular imaging applications which do not require good spatial resolution-for example, screening applications for drug development or new imaging agents. Rather than as an alternative to high-resolution SPECT systems, the high-sensitivity system is proposed as a radiotracer alternative to optical imaging for small animals. We have developed a prototype system for mouse imaging applications. The scanner consists of two large, thin, closely spaced scintillation detectors. Simulation studies indicate that a FWHM spatial resolution of 7 mm is possible. In an in vivo mouse imaging study using the (99m)Tc labeled tracer MAG-3, the sensitivity of the system is measured to be 40%. Simple projection images created by analytically combining the two detectors' data show sufficient resolution to observe the dynamic distribution of the radiotracer in the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190360      PMCID: PMC2755060          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

Review 1.  Small animal imaging with high resolution single photon emission tomography.

Authors:  Paul D Acton; Hank F Kung
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Quantitative comparison of the sensitivity of detection of fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters in animal models.

Authors:  Tamara Troy; Dragana Jekic-McMullen; Lidia Sambucetti; Brad Rice
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Quantitative PET imaging of tumor integrin alphavbeta3 expression with 18F-FRGD2.

Authors:  Xianzhong Zhang; Zhengming Xiong; Yun Wu; Weibo Cai; Jeffery R Tseng; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Performance improvement of small gamma camera using NaI(Tl) plate and position sensitive photo-multiplier tubes.

Authors:  Myung Hwan Jeong; Yong Choi; Yong Hyun Chung; Tae Yong Song; Jin Ho Jung; Key Jo Hong; Byung Jun Min; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies.

Authors:  Steven R Meikle; Peter Kench; Michael Kassiou; Richard B Banati
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Small-animal SPECT and SPECT/CT: important tools for preclinical investigation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Franc; Paul D Acton; Carina Mari; Bruce H Hasegawa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The EM algorithm in medical imaging.

Authors:  J Kay
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Instrumentation aspects of animal PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Richard Laforest
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Bing Bai; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  In vivo positron-emission tomography imaging of progression and transformation in a mouse model of mammary neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Alexander D Borowsky; Erik T McGoldrick; Jeffrey P Gregg; Jeannie E Maglione; Robert D Cardiff; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Whole animal imaging.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Sandhu; Luis Solorio; Ann-Marie Broome; Nicolas Salem; Jeff Kolthammer; Tejas Shah; Chris Flask; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Un-collimated single-photon imaging system for high-sensitivity small animal and plant imaging.

Authors:  Katherine L Walker; Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry; Gregory S Mitchell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Molecular Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer with Antibodies.

Authors:  Christopher G England; Reinier Hernandez; Savo Bou Zein Eddine; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.939

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.