Literature DB >> 19190359

Treatment vault shielding for a flattening filter-free medical linear accelerator.

Stephen F Kry1, Rebecca M Howell, Jerimy Polf, Radhe Mohan, Oleg N Vassiliev.   

Abstract

The requirements for shielding a treatment vault with a Varian Clinac 2100 medical linear accelerator operated both with and without the flattening filter were assessed. Basic shielding parameters, such as primary beam tenth-value layers (TVLs), patient scatter fractions, and wall scatter fractions, were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations of 6, 10 and 18 MV beams. Relative integral target current requirements were determined from treatment planning studies of several disease sites with, and without, the flattening filter. The flattened beam shielding data were compared to data published in NCRP Report No. 151, and the unflattened beam shielding data were presented relative to the NCRP data. Finally, the shielding requirements for a typical treatment vault were determined for a single-energy (6 MV) linac and a dual-energy (6 MV/18 MV) linac. With the exception of large-angle patient scatter fractions and wall scatter fractions, the vault shielding parameters were reduced when the flattening filter was removed. Much of this reduction was consistent with the reduced average energy of the FFF beams. Primary beam TVLs were reduced by 12%, on average, and small-angle scatter fractions were reduced by up to 30%. Head leakage was markedly reduced because less integral target current was required to deliver the target dose. For the treatment vault examined in the current study, removal of the flattening filter reduced the required thickness of the primary and secondary barriers by 10-20%, corresponding to 18 m(3) less concrete to shield the single-energy linac and 36 m(3) less concrete to shield the dual-energy linac. Thus, a shielding advantage was found when the linac was operated without the flattening filter. This translates into a reduction in occupational exposure and/or the cost and space of shielding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190359     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  An end-to-end examination of geometric accuracy of IGRT using a new digital accelerator equipped with onboard imaging system.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Kayla N Kielar; Ed Mok; Annie Hsu; Sonja Dieterich; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Unflattened photon beams from the standard flattening filter free accelerators for radiotherapy: Advantages, limitations and challenges.

Authors:  Sunil Dutt Sharma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-07

3.  Results of a 10-year survey of workload for 10 treatment vaults at a high-throughput comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Ziad H Saleh; Jeho Jeong; Brian Quinn; James Mechalakos; Jean St Germain; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Structural Shielding Design of a 6 MV Flattening Filter Free Linear Accelerator: Indian Scenario.

Authors:  Bibekananda Mishra; T Palani Selvam; P K Dash Sharma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Ellen Yorke; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis; Ping Xia; Saiful Huq; John Bayouth; James Galvin; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.