Literature DB >> 19190276

Asphyxial games or "the choking game": a potentially fatal risk behaviour.

A J Macnab1, M Deevska, F Gagnon, W G Cannon, T Andrew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of knowledge about and participation in asphyxial games, sometimes called "the choking game", and how best to raise awareness of this risk-taking behaviour and provide preventive education.
DESIGN: Questionnaire; collaborative research model; lay advocacy group/university researchers.
SETTING: 8 middle and high schools in Texas (six) and Ontario (two). A recent death from playing the choking game had occurred in one Texas school, and two other fatalities had occurred within the state.
SUBJECTS: Students in grades 4-12, aged 9-18 years. INTERVENTION: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: None.
RESULTS: Of 2762 surveys distributed, 2504 (90.7%) were completed. The mean (SD) age of the responders was 13.7 (2.2) years. 68% of children had heard about the game, 45% knew somebody who played it, and 6.6% had tried it, 93.9% of those with someone else. Forty percent of children perceived no risk. Information that playing the game could result in death or brain damage was reported as most likely to influence behaviour. The most respected source of a preventive education message was parents for pre-adolescents (43%) or victim/victim's family (36%) for older adolescents.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of and participation in self-asphyxial behaviour is not unusual among schoolchildren. The age of the child probably determines the best source (parents or victim/victim's family) of preventive education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190276     DOI: 10.1136/ip.2008.018523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  7 in total

1.  Suicide among children and adolescents in Canada: trends and sex differences, 1980-2008.

Authors:  Robin Skinner; Steven McFaull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Impact of Education on School-aged Children's Knowledge of and Participation in "The Choking Game".

Authors:  Kendall Butler; Bonnie Raingruber; Eric Butler; Machelle Wilson
Journal:  Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2016-06-13

3.  Prevention of the Choking Game: parent perspectives.

Authors:  Jessica M Bernacki; W Hobart Davies
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2011-04-16

Review 4.  Prevalence and associated harm of engagement in self-asphyxial behaviours ('choking game') in young people: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Busse; T Harrop; D Gunnell; R Kipping
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students.

Authors:  Debby Herbenick; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Heather Eastman-Mueller; Sally Thomas; Dubravka Svetina Valdivia; Molly Rosenberg; Lucia Guerra-Reyes; Paul J Wright; Keisuke Kawata; John R Feiner
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-28

6.  Declines in the lethality of suicide attempts explain the decline in suicide deaths in Australia.

Authors:  Matthew J Spittal; Jane Pirkis; Matthew Miller; David M Studdert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Choking Game on YouTube: An Update.

Authors:  Ellen K Defenderfer; Jillian E Austin; W Hobart Davies
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2016-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.