Literature DB >> 19189186

Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center.

Katja Ott1, Franz G Bader, Florian Lordick, Marcus Feith, Holger Bartels, J Ruediger Siewert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a considerable number of randomized studies, the surgical approach to locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) I and II is still discussed controversially. Thus, we evaluated the surgical risk and outcome after an abdominothoracic esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) with intrathoracic anastomosis as standard procedure.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2006, a total of 240 consecutive patients underwent standardized right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis operation) for AEG I (n = 206) or AEG II (n = 34). A total of 157 patients (65.4%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.9% (43 of 240). Overall mortality was 3.8% (9 of 240). The majority of patients (4 of 9) died because of severe pulmonary complications (44.4%) irrespective of surgical complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase morbidity or mortality. The median overall survival was 51 months. Multivariate analysis including age >75 years, clinical response to chemotherapy, complications, R-category and N-category revealed R-category (P = .005; relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14-0.70) and complications (P < .001, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.35) as independent prognostic factors for all patients. Complications was the only independent prognostic factor (P < .001, RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.08-0.35) for the R0 resected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: At an experienced center, Ivor-Lewis resection is a safe surgical procedure. Outcome of patients was significantly influenced by surgical factors such as complete resection and complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The high mortality from non-surgery-related complications emphasizes the importance of careful preoperative evaluation of comorbidities and patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19189186     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  37 in total

Review 1.  Overview of multimodal therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Keishi Yamashita; Natusya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.

Authors:  Silvio Däster; Savas D Soysal; Luca Koechlin; Lea Stoll; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe; Christoph Ackermann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  [Gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: principles of neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  F Lordick; K Ott; A Sendler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement and the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

Authors:  Leila Sisic; Susanne Blank; Wilko Weichert; Dirk Jäger; Christoph Springfeld; Marcel Hochreiter; Markus Büchler; Katja Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Heger; Susanne Blank; Markus K Diener; Alexis Ulrich; Thomas Schmidt; Markus W Büchler; André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Association of the VEGF 936C>T polymorphism with FDG uptake, clinical, histopathological, and metabolic response in patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Sylvie Lorenzen; Ben Panzram; Gisela Keller; Florian Lordick; Ken Herrmann; Karin Becker; Ruppert Langer; Markus Schwaiger; Jorg Rudiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.

Authors:  Daniel Reim; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-01-08

8.  Serial CRP levels following oesophagectomy: a marker for anastomotic dehiscence.

Authors:  Peter McAnena; Colm Neary; Conor Doyle; Michael J Kerin; Oliver J McAnena; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Surgery for esophageal cancer: quality of life matters.

Authors:  Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.