Literature DB >> 19188642

Minimal risk in pediatric research as a function of age.

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

The minimal risk standard allows institutional review boards (IRBs) to approve pediatric research when the risks do not exceed the risks children face in daily life or during routine examinations. The fact that the risks children face in daily life vary with age raises the question of whether IRBs should implement this standard by adopting 1, 2, 3, or even more risk standards. The level of research risks to which it is appropriate to expose children depends on their maturity level. While younger children should be exposed to only very low research risks, it can be appropriate to expose older children to somewhat higher risks. This analysis supports 2 thresholds for minimal risk in pediatric research: one for research with younger children and a distinct standard for older children who can understand and who agree to participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188642     DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  7 in total

1.  Youth and Parent Appraisals of Participation in a Study of Spontaneous and Induced Pediatric Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Kara Hawley; Jeannie S Huang; Matthew Goodwin; Damaris Diaz; Virginia R de Sa; Kathryn A Birnie; Christine T Chambers; Kenneth D Craig
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2018-04-30

2.  Empirical examination of the potential adverse psychological effects associated with pediatric FMRI scanning.

Authors:  Tomer Shechner; Naomi Wakschlag; Jennifer C Britton; Johanna Jarcho; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.576

3.  Ethics of clinical research with mentally ill persons.

Authors:  Hanfried Helmchen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Setting risk thresholds in biomedical research: lessons from the debate about minimal risk.

Authors:  Annette Rid
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Mar-Jun

5.  Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children.

Authors:  Eva De Clercq; Domnita Oana Badarau; Katharina M Ruhe; Tenzin Wangmo
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

6.  Minimal risk in research involving pregnant women and fetuses.

Authors:  Carson Strong
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.