Literature DB >> 19188506

Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation.

Duk-Hyun Kang1, Jeong Hoon Kim, Ji Hye Rim, Mi-Jeong Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Jong-Min Song, Hyun Song, Kee-Joon Choi, Jae-Kwan Song, Jae-Won Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of surgical intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation is unclear. We therefore compared the long-term results of early surgery with a conventional treatment strategy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From 1996 to 2005, 447 consecutive asymptomatic patients (253 men, age 50+/-15 years) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function were evaluated prospectively. The end point was defined as the composite of operative mortality, cardiac death, repeat mitral valve surgery, and urgent admission due to congestive heart failure during follow-up. Early surgery was performed on 161 patients (operated group), and the conventional treatment strategy was used for 286 patients (conventional treatment group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, euroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), or ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 1988 days, there were 2 repeat surgeries and no cardiac deaths or operative mortality in the operated group compared with 12 cardiac deaths, 1 repeat surgery, and 22 admissions for congestive heart failure in the conventional treatment group. The estimated actuarial 7-year cardiac mortality rate was 0% in the operated group and 5+/-2% in the conventional treatment group (P=0.008), and for 127 propensity score-matched pairs, the estimated actuarial 7-year event-free survival rate was significantly higher in the operated than in the conventional treatment group (99+/-1% versus 85+/-4%, P=0.007). In the conventional treatment group, baseline grade of pulmonary hypertension (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.87, P=0.003), age (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04, P=0.005), and effective regurgitant orifice area (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.82, P=0.02) were independent variables that predicted late development of surgical indications or congestive heart failure on Cox multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conservative management, the strategy of early surgery was associated with an improved long-term event rate by decreasing cardiac mortality and congestive heart failure hospitalization more effectively in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. Early surgery may therefore further improve clinical outcomes in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation with preserved left ventricular systolic function and a high likelihood of mitral valve repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188506     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.802314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Changes in left ventricular morphology and function after mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexis E Shafii; A Marc Gillinov; Tomislav Mihaljevic; William Stewart; Lillian H Batizy; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Mitral valve repair in the treatment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Blase A Carabello
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-12

Review 3.  Exercise hemodynamics in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Anna M Booher; David S Bach
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, mitral regurgitation and outcomes: the importance of accurate assessment in an era of increasing intervention.

Authors:  Rebecca Kozor; Stuart Grieve; Gemma Figtree; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Facts and principles learned at the 39th Annual Williamsburg Conference on Heart Disease.

Authors:  Mina M Benjamin; William C Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-04

Review 6.  Exercise echocardiography for structural heart disease.

Authors:  Masaki Izumo; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 7.  Current status of stress echocardiography: is it a required procedure for every sonographer?

Authors:  Masaaki Takeuchi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 8.  Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution.

Authors:  David H Adams; Raphael Rosenhek; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Posterior ventricular anchoring neochordal repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation efficiently remodels and repositions posterior leaflet prolapse.

Authors:  Y Joseph Woo; John W MacArthur
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Single-centre experience with mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Wouter J van Leeuwen; Stuart J Head; Lotte E de Groot-de Laat; Marcel L Geleijnse; Ad J J C Bogers; Lex A Van Herwerden; A Pieter Kappetein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.