Literature DB >> 19188320

Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnostic importance of normal abdominopelvic CT findings with nonvisualized appendix.

Kimberly Garcia1, Marta Hernanz-Schulman, Debbie Lee Bennett, Stephen E Morrow, Chang Yu, J Herman Kan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether lack of visualization of the appendix on otherwise normal abdominopelvic computed tomographic (CT) images can help exclude appendicitis in the pediatric population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. One thousand one hundred thirty-nine children suspected of having appendicitis were referred for CT examination between July 2002 and December 2006. Exclusion criteria included CT diagnosis of appendicitis or other cause of symptoms and lack of clinical follow-up. Consensus review was performed by two pediatric radiologists to determine normal examinations, leaving a final study group (nonvisualized appendix) of 156 patients (mean age, 9.6 years; boys, 7.2 years; girls, 10.2 years) and a control group (visualized appendix) of 421 patients (mean age, 11.0 years; boys, 9.8 years; girls, 11.2 years). In the control group, there were 168 subjects with a partially visualized (PV) appendix and 253 with a fully visualized (FV) appendix. Pericecal fat was graded according to published criteria. Diagnosis was confirmed at surgery or clinical follow-up. Negative predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: There were three false-negative findings (study group, two; control group, one [FV]). The negative predictive value of a normal CT examination in pediatric patients with a nonvisualized appendix was 98.7% (95% CI: 95.5%, 99.8%); that with a visualized appendix, 99.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 99.99%); that with a PV appendix, 100% (95% CI: 97.8%, 100%); and that with a FV appendix, 99.6% (95% CI: 97.8%, 99.99%).
CONCLUSION: Pediatric abdominopelvic CT images with nonvisualized appendix have a high negative predictive value, without significant difference from cases with a PV or even FV appendix. The false-negative rate was similar to those reported in two adult series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188320     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2502080624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Acute appendicitis in childhood: oral contrast does not improve CT diagnosis.

Authors:  Crystal R Farrell; Adam D Bezinque; Jared M Tucker; Erica A Michiels; Bradford W Betz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-01-06

2.  Iterative reconstruction technique with reduced volume CT dose index: diagnostic accuracy in pediatric acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ryne A Didier; Petra L Vajtai; Katharine L Hopkins
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-07-05

Review 3.  Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Utility of applying white blood cell cutoffs to non-diagnostic MRI and ultrasound studies for suspected pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas M Kennedy; Amy D Thompson; Arabinda K Choudhary; Richard J Caplan; Kathleen E Schenker; Andrew D DePiero
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT findings of acute appendicitis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ji Ye Sim; Hyuk Jung Kim; Jae Woo Yeon; Byoung Sun Suh; Ki Ho Kim; Young Rock Ha; So Ya Paik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Do clinical outcomes suffer during transition to an ultrasound-first paradigm for the evaluation of acute appendicitis in children?

Authors:  Jenna Le; Jessica Kurian; Hillel W Cohen; Gerard Weinberg; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael M Moore; Afif N Kulaylat; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Brett W Engbrecht; Jonathan R Dillman; Sosamma T Methratta
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 8.  Ultrasound of paediatric appendicitis and its secondary sonographic signs: providing a more meaningful finding.

Authors:  Tristan Reddan; Jonathan Corness; Kerrie Mengersen; Fiona Harden
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-01-20

9.  Ultrasound for Appendicitis: Performance and Integration with Clinical Parameters.

Authors:  Fanny Löfvenberg; Martin Salö
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The accuracy of pre-appendectomy computed tomography with histopathological correlation: a clinical audit, case discussion and evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  George Benjamin Collins; Tien Jin Tan; John Gifford; Andrew Tan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.