Literature DB >> 19187918

Predicting the cause of syncope from clinical history in patients undergoing prolonged monitoring.

Sachin Sud1, George J Klein, Allan C Skanes, Lorne J Gula, Raymond Yee, Andrew D Krahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syncope may be the result of primary bradycardia or tachycardia, vasovagal syncope, or noncardiac syncope. Risk factors and outcome scores to predict prognosis in patients with syncope have been developed. Although these correlate with morbidity and mortality in patients with syncope, their relationship with the mechanism of syncope has not been investigated.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical predictors of primary bradycardia in a cohort of patients undergoing prolonged monitoring for unexplained syncope.
METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients underwent prolonged monitoring with an implantable or external loop recorder after assessment at a single-center, tertiary care arrhythmia service. Fifty-two patients with recurrent syncope during monitoring were classified according to the mechanism of syncope (International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology [ISSUE] classification). Clinical predictors of primary arrhythmic syncope were identified.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were classified with primary arrhythmia and 32 patients were classified with nonarrhythmic syncope. Five clinical variables were associated with primary arrhythmia: left bundle branch block, structural heart disease, and syncope without prodrome increased the likelihood of primary arrhythmia; a normal baseline ECG and history of syncope in childhood decreased the likelihood of primary arrhythmia. After multiple logistic regression, risk factors for the diagnosis of primary arrhythmia included syncope without warning symptoms and structural heart disease. The presence of left bundle branch block correlated perfectly with primary arrhythmia, whereas a normal ECG reduced the likelihood of primary arrhythmia.
CONCLUSION: Clinical predictors of primary arrhythmia in patients with recurrent syncope include normal ECG and structural heart disease. Left bundle branch block is an important finding in patients with unexplained syncope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19187918     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  10 in total

1.  2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Robert S Sheldon; Blair P Grubb; Brian Olshansky; Win-Kuang Shen; Hugh Calkins; Michele Brignole; Satish R Raj; Andrew D Krahn; Carlos A Morillo; Julian M Stewart; Richard Sutton; Paola Sandroni; Karen J Friday; Denise Tessariol Hachul; Mitchell I Cohen; Dennis H Lau; Kenneth A Mayuga; Jeffrey P Moak; Roopinder K Sandhu; Khalil Kanjwal
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Clinical characteristics associated with bradycardia and asystole in patients with syncope undergoing long-term electrocardiographic monitoring with implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Peter Mitro; Miloš Šimurda; Ervin Müller
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope: Clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Martin Huemer; Ann-Kristin Becker; Alexander Wutzler; Philipp Attanasio; Abdul S Parwani; Philipp Lacour; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Burkert Pieske; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Florian Blaschke
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 4.  [Syncope and fitness to drive].

Authors:  Hermann H Klein
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-15

5.  Predictors of positive electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block: PR interval and type of conduction disturbance.

Authors:  Ivo Roca-Luque; Gerard Oristrell; Jaume Francisco-Pasqual; Julián Rodríguez-García; Alba Santos-Ortega; Gabriel Martin-Sanchez; Nuria Rivas-Gandara; Jordi Perez-Rodon; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; David García-Dorado; Angel Moya-Mitjans
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Role of electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block.

Authors:  Neshat Nazari; Ala Keykhavani; Sima Sayah; Mostafa Hekmat; Allahyar Golabchi; Mohammad Assadian Rad; Abolfath Alizadeh; Mona Heidarali
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Holter ECG for Syncope Evaluation in the Internal Medicine Department-Choosing the Right Patients.

Authors:  Ophir Freund; Inbar Caspi; Yacov Shacham; Shir Frydman; Roni Biran; Hytham Abu Katash; Lior Zornitzki; Gil Bornstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Clinical symptoms associated with asystolic or bradycardic responses on implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients with recurrent syncope.

Authors:  Khalil Kanjwal; Yousuf Kanjwal; Beverly Karabin; Blair P Grubb
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Identifying cardiac syncope based on clinical history: a literature-based model tested in four independent datasets.

Authors:  Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Aaron Sheldon; Wouter Wieling; Nynke van Dijk; Giorgio Costantino; Raffaello Furlan; Win-Kuang Shen; Robert Sheldon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unexplained syncope: implications of age and gender on patient characteristics and evaluation, the diagnostic yield of an implantable loop recorder, and the subsequent treatment.

Authors:  Nils Edvardsson; Claudio Garutti; Guido Rieger; Nicholas J Linker
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.882

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.