Literature DB >> 1918704

Diagnosis of ischemic heart disease with adenosine echocardiography.

W A Zoghbi1, J Cheirif, N S Kleiman, M S Verani, A Trakhtenbroit.   

Abstract

To assess the feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine infusion combined with echocardiography, 73 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent echocardiography at baseline and during a maximal intravenous adenosine infusion of 140 micrograms/kg per min. Compared with baseline values, adenosine caused an increase in heart rate, a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and a slight but significant increase in rate-pressure product. The echocardiographic images were digitized and randomly assigned in a quad-screen format for nonbiased interpretation. An ischemic response, defined as a new or worsening wall motion abnormality, developed in 25 patients; a fixed wall motion abnormality was present in 27 and no abnormality in 21. All patients underwent coronary angiography. The sensitivity of adenosine echocardiography for greater than or equal to 75% coronary artery diameter stenosis was 85% (46 of 54), with a specificity of 92% in patients with normal coronary arteries. In the 35 patients with a normal baseline electrocardiogram the sensitivity was 60%; 9 (82%) of 11 patients with multivessel disease were correctly identified. The sensitivity for adenosine electrocardiography (greater than or equal to 1-mm ST depression) was 35% with a specificity of 100%. Side effects were transient and mild; aminophylline was used in two patients. Thus, ischemic changes can be induced in patients with coronary artery disease with intravenous adenosine that, combined with echocardiography, is sensitive for the assessment of ischemic heart disease, particularly in patients with multivessel disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918704     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90546-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; M S Verani; J Heo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Stress echocardiography: time for critical reappraisal.

Authors:  P K Mazeika; P Nihoyannopoulos; C M Oakley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

Review 5.  Evaluating coronary artery disease noninvasively--which test for whom?

Authors:  T M Chou; T M Amidon
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-08

6.  Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during adenosine infusion in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Brian G Abbott; Maryam Afshar; Alan K Berger; Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Adenosine-associated delivery systems.

Authors:  Mehdi Kazemzadeh-Narbat; Nasim Annabi; Ali Tamayol; Rahmi Oklu; Amyl Ghanem; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 8.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.