Literature DB >> 12569326

Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during adenosine infusion in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Brian G Abbott1, Maryam Afshar, Alan K Berger, Frans J Th Wackers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of ST-segment depression during adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been shown to be an independent predictor of subsequent cardiac events and worse outcome, particularly in association with ischemic defects. However, the prognostic significance of ST-segment depression with adenosine in patients with normal MPI is not known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 3231 patients undergoing adenosine MPI. Patients with baseline electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities were excluded. Overall, 228 patients (7%) had ischemic ECG changes develop during adenosine infusion. Of these, 66 (29% [2% of all patients]) had normal MPI (+ECG group). An age- and sex-matched group of 200 patients with normal MPI without ECG changes served as control subjects (-ECG group). During a mean follow-up of 29 +/- 12 months, patients in the +ECG group had significantly more adverse cardiac events than those in the -ECG group (nonfatal myocardial infarction, 7.6% vs 0.5%, respectively, P = .004; subsequent revascularization, 13.6% vs 2.5%, respectively, P = .0015). Although cardiac death alone did not differ between the 2 groups (+ECG, 3.0%, vs -ECG, 1.0%; P = .25), cumulative survival free from cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction was worse in patients with ST-segment depression during adenosine infusion and normal MPI (+ECG, 10.6%, vs -ECG, 1.5%; log-rank chi(2) = 11.82; P = .0006).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with normal myocardial perfusion images in whom ST-segment depression develops during adenosine administration appear to be at increased risk for future cardiac events compared with similar patients without ECG evidence of ischemia. Ischemic ECG changes during adenosine MPI should warrant further evaluation, even when perfusion images are reassuring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12569326     DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.127625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  21 in total

1.  Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion images: methodology and validation of the Yale-CQ method.

Authors:  Y H Liu; A J Sinusas; P DeMan; B L Zaret; F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; M S Verani; J Heo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Tolerance and diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated adenosine infusion for myocardial scintigraphy: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  M G Treuth; G A Reyes; Z X He; E Cwajg; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prognostic implications of normal exercise SPECT thallium images in patients with strongly positive exercise electrocardiograms.

Authors:  B D Schalet; J G Kegel; J Heo; B L Segal; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Comparison of 3- versus 6-minute infusions of adenosine in thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  B J Villegas; R C Hendel; S T Dahlberg; B A McSherry; J A Leppo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin myocardial tomography in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between adenosine and dynamic exercise stress testing.

Authors:  A Cuocolo; E Nicolai; A Soricelli; L Pace; A Nappi; P Sullo; S Cardei; L Argenziano; P J Ell; M Salvatore
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Prognostic value of adenosine single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium imaging in medically treated patients with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A M Kamal; A A Fattah; S Pancholy; S Aksut; V Cave; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  28 in total

1.  ST-segment depression during vasodilator stress is of minor clinical importance in women with normal myocardial perfusion imaging and low or intermediate risk of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Dimitris J Apostolopoulos; Periklis Davlouros; Sotiria Alexiou; Nikolaos Patsouras; Trifon Spyridonidis; Pavlos J Vassilakos; Dimitrios Alexopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Patients with adenosine-induced ST-segment depressions and normal myocardial perfusion imaging: cardiac outcomes at 24 months.

Authors:  Jyoti Sharma; Christine Roncari; Kenneth N Giedd; John T Fox; Yumiko Kanei
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Risk stratification of the normal perfusion scan: does normal stress perfusion always mean very low risk?

Authors:  Seth Dahlberg; Jeffrey Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The vasodilator stress ECG: should depression cause anxiety?

Authors:  Brian G Abbott
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prevalence and significance of electrocardiographic changes and side effect profile of regadenoson compared with adenosine during myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Maliha Zahid; Aaysha Kapila; Cecelia E Eagan; David A Yusko; Edwin D Miller; Cheryl D Missenda
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-02-27

6.  Cardiovascular risk assessment in cancer patients undergoing major surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Pryma; Gregory Ravizzini; David Amar; Virginia L Richards; Jigar B Patel; H William Strauss
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Significance of ST depression during exercise treadmill stress and adenosine infusion myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Lok B Yap; Waleed Arshad; Ajay Jain; Arvinder S Kurbaan; Neil W Garvie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  The clinical importance of electrocardiographic changes during pharmacologic stress testing with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cosmai; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Stress protocols and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; Manuel D Cerqueira; John J Mahmarian; Siu-Sun Yao
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.