Literature DB >> 19186977

Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: follow-up results from a multicenter study.

William Becker1, Moshe Goldstein, Burton E Becker, Lars Sennerby, Dean Kois, Philippe Hujoel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The placement of implants using a minimally invasive flapless approach has the potential to reduce operative bleeding and postoperative discomfort and minimize crestal bone loss. This article presents follow-up data on a prospective clinical study of implants placed using a flapless procedure.
METHODS: The original study reported on 57 patients (33 female patients with an age range of 24 to 86 years; 24 male patients with an age range of 27 to 81 years) recruited from three clinical centers (Tucson, Arizona; Gothenburg, Sweden; and Tel Aviv, Israel) who received 79 implants. After an average of 3 years and 8 months, the patients were contacted and invited to return to their respective clinics for reexamination. Thirty-seven patients with 52 implants returned for a follow-up examination; the remaining 20 patients (27 implants) were not available for reexamination and were considered study drop-outs.
RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate at the 3- to 4-year follow-up examination remains at 98.7%, reflecting the loss of one implant. The mean probing depth at abutment connection was 2.2 mm, as reported in the initial study (examination 2 at approximately 2 years postplacement); it was 2.4 mm at the 3- to 4-year second follow-up examination. This change was not clinically or statistically significant. Bleeding score changes also were not significant between the two intervals. The average crestal bone level was -0.7 mm at examination 2 and -0.8 mm at examination 3, a change that approached significance (P <0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive flapless surgery offers patients the possibility of high implant predictability with clinically insignificant crestal bone loss for up to 4 years. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning are key factors in achieving predictable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186977     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  5 in total

1.  Increasing volume of vestibular soft tissues in flapless implant surgery through a modified connective punch technique: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; C Andrisani; S Lico; F Silvestre; M Gargari; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

Review 2.  Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery.

Authors:  D P Laverty; J Buglass; A Patel
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Open flap versus flapless placement of dental implants. A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Enric Jané-Salas; Xavier Roselló-LLabrés; Enric Jané-Pallí; Siddharth Mishra; Raúl Ayuso-Montero; José López-López
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a two-center prospective study.

Authors:  Maximilian Moergel; Salomão Rocha; Ana Messias; Pedro Nicolau; Fernando Guerra; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance.

Authors:  Emitis Natali Naeini; Mandana Atashkadeh; Hugo De Bruyn; Jan D'Haese
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.932

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.