Literature DB >> 19185924

Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.

Janka Jakubíková1, Zuzana Kabátová, Gabriela Pavlovcinová, Milan Profant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: More than 80% of permanent hearing losses (HL) in children are congenital. Newborn hearing screening (NHS) is the best method for early detection of suspected hearing loss. If the NHS is not universal more than 30% permanent hearing losses are not identified. There are various methods of NHS: otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE, DPOAE) and automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR). After hearing screening, and when hearing loss is suspected, tympanometry and audiological methods then used for determination of hearing threshold; these include ABR, ASSR or/and behavioral methods. The goal of this study is to evaluate the influence of UNHS on the early detection of hearing loss in children before and after the implementation of obligatory universal newborn hearing screening in Slovakia, and also on the etiologic evaluation of hearing impaired infants identified by screening.
METHOD: In Slovakia NHS started in 1998 and was provided in ENT departments. From May 1, 2006 UNHS has been mandatory in Slovakia, using two stages TEOAE in all newborn departments in Slovakia (64 newborn departments). In year 2005--42% of newborns in Slovakia were screened, in 2006--66% newborns and in 2007--94, 99% (three small newborn departments do not yet have equipment for OAE screening). For determination of hearing thresholds ASSR are used in two ENT departments and ABR in the other four ENT departments.
RESULTS: Comparing the number of identified cases with bilateral severe permanent HL or deafness before and after UNHS, 22.8% more cases of PHL were identified in the first year of UNHS. Also the average age of diagnosis of PHL was lower. In the year 2007, 94% of newborns were screened. We found 0.947/1000 newborns with bilateral severe PHL (35.9%) more than before UNHS). After audiologic and etiologic assessment of the 76 infants who failed screening, 5 (6.58%) were found to have normal hearing, 16 (22.54%) had unilateral and 55 (77.46%) had bilateral SNHL. A non-syndromic genetic cause was present in 25.45% of cases, syndromic in 9%, perinatal cause (31%), congenital CMV infection in 7.27%, bilateral cochlear anomalies without other abnormality in 1.83% and unknown etiology in 25.45%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19185924     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  12 in total

Review 1.  Screening in child health: studies of the efficacy and relevance of preventive care practices.

Authors:  Peter Weber; Oskar Jenni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age.

Authors:  Farhad Farahani; Morteza Hamidi Nahrani; Mohammad Ali Seifrabiei; Maryam Emadi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 3.  Universal newborn hearing screening in 2010.

Authors:  Daniel Choo; Jareen Meinzen-Derr
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss: Western Sicily overview.

Authors:  Pietro Salvago; Enrico Martines; Francesco Martines
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hasan Ibrahim Al-Balas; Amjad Nuseir; Maha Zaitoun; Mahmoud Al-Balas; Almu'atasim Khamees; Hamzeh Al-Balas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  Clinical profile of hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection: CMV DNA diagnosis using preserved umbilical cord.

Authors:  Sakiko Furutate; Satoshi Iwasaki; Shin-ya Nishio; Hideaki Moteki; Shin-ichi Usami
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa.

Authors:  Paolo Ghirri; Annalisa Liumbruno; Sara Lunardi; Francesca Forli; Antonio Boldrini; Angelo Baggiani; Stefano Berrettini
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Assessment of Hearing Loss by OAE in Asphyxiated Newborns.

Authors:  Elaheh Amini; Zahra Kasheh Farahani; Mehdi Rafiee Samani; Hamed Hamedi; Ali Zamani; Alireza Karimi Yazdi; Fatemeh Nayeri; Firoozeh Nili; Golnaz Rezaeizadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  Universal neonatal hearing screening in Albania, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Edlira Beqiri; Daniela Nika
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2015-02-21

Review 10.  Inner Hair Cell Loss Disrupts Hearing and Cochlear Function Leading to Sensory Deprivation and Enhanced Central Auditory Gain.

Authors:  Richard Salvi; Wei Sun; Dalian Ding; Guang-Di Chen; Edward Lobarinas; Jian Wang; Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.