Literature DB >> 1918580

The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites.

G Willems1, P Lambrechts, M Braem, M Vuylsteke-Wauters, G Vanherle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas in order to provide a standard for comparison with surface characteristics of commercially available composite restorative materials. In addition, the inherent surface roughness of resin composites was evaluated profilometrically after a toothbrush abrasion procedure. A one-sided t-test analysis was performed to outline significant differences between the surface roughness value of enamel facets and that of the respective composite samples. A surface roughness of 0.64 +/- 0.25 micron (mean +/- S.D.) was found for the enamel-to-enamel contact areas.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918580     DOI: 10.1177/00220345910700091301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  11 in total

1.  MECHANICAL TESTING OF A PHOTOCURED CHOPPED FIBER REINFORCED DENTAL COMPOSITE.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Edward G Wenski
Journal:  Int SAMPE Symp Exhib       Date:  2002-05

2.  Real-time microsensor measurement of local metabolic activities in ex vivo dental biofilms exposed to sucrose and treated with chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Christiane von Ohle; Armin Gieseke; Laura Nistico; Eva Maria Decker; Dirk DeBeer; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Susceptibility of planktonic versus attached Streptococcus sanguinis cells to chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Decker; R Weiger; C von Ohle; I Wiech; M Brecx
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of Different Polishing Systems and Speeds for Dental Zirconia.

Authors:  Ramakiran Chavali; Chee Paul Lin; Nathaniel C Lawson
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing.

Authors:  Hyung-In Yoon; Hyo-Mi Noh; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparison of surface abrasion produced on the enamel surface by a standard dentifrice using three different toothbrush bristle designs: A profilometric in vitro study.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Minal Kumari; Shashidhar Acharya; Ram Prasad
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-07

7.  A Profilometric Study to Assess the Role of Toothbrush and Toothpaste in Abrasion Process.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Siddharth Kumar Singh; Anjali Gupta; Sayak Roy; Mohit Sareen; Sarang Khajuria
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-09

8.  Metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Decker; Christian Klein; Dimitri Schwindt; Christiane von Ohle
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Surface Geometry of Four Conventional Nanohybrid Resin-Based Composites and Four Regular Viscosity Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites after Two-Step Polishing Procedure.

Authors:  Mateusz Granat; Janusz Cieloszyk; Urszula Kowalska; Jadwiga Buczkowska-Radlińska; Ryta Łagocka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness.

Authors:  Ozge Gurbuz; Aylin Cilingir; Benin Dikmen; Alev Ozsoy; Meltem Mert Eren
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2020-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.