Literature DB >> 19184037

Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.

Kazuhiro Kitajima1, Koji Murakami, Erena Yamasaki, Yasushi Kaji, Kazuro Sugimura.   

Abstract

The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography ((CT) with intravenous contrast medium in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer, with surgical and histopathological findings used as the reference standard. Forty-five patients with endometrial or uterine cervical cancer underwent radical hysterectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy, after PET/CT. PET/CT findings were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in consensus. The criterion for malignancy on PET/CT images was increased tracer uptake by the lymph node, independent of node size. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases were 51.1% (23/45), 99.8% (1,927/1,931), 85.2% (23/27), 98.9% (1,927/1,949) and 98.7% (1,950/1,976), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions 4 mm or less in short-axis diameter was 12.5% (2/16), that for between 5 and 9 mm was 66.7% (16/24), and that for 10 mm or larger was 100.0% (5/5). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ((PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 50% (6/12), 90.9% (30/33), 66.7% (6/9), 83.3% (30/36) and 80.0% (36/45), respectively. Integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is superior to conventional imaging, but only moderately sensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with uterine cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184037     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1271-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Validity of positron emission tomography using fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for the preoperative evaluation of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Suzuki; E Miyagi; N Takahashi; A Sukegawa; A Suzuki; I Koike; K Sugiura; N Okamoto; T Inoue; F Hirahara
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  The prognostic significance of number of positive nodes in cervical carcinoma stages IB, IIA, and IIB.

Authors:  T Inoue; K Morita
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Increased standardized uptake value in the primary lesion predicts nodal or distant metastases at presentation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Sharona Sachs; Thomas V Bilfinger; Eugene Komaroff; Dinko Franceschi
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  F B Stehman; B N Bundy; P J DiSaia; H M Keys; J E Larson; W C Fowler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Harry Agress; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Eyu Nyong Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Detection of lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma and uterine corpus carcinoma by preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T Sugiyama; T Nishida; K Ushijima; N Sato; A Kataoka; K Imaishi; K Fujiyoshi; M Yakushiji
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995)       Date:  1995-12

8.  Evaluation of lymph node metastases of breast cancer using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tomoaki Harada; Nobuhiko Tanigawa; Mitsuru Matsuki; Takehiro Nohara; Isamu Narabayashi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer.

Authors:  Wataru Shimoda; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Koji Murakami; Tetsunari Oyama; Masakatsu Sunagawa
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning.

Authors:  Riccardo Manfredi; Paoletta Mirk; Giulia Maresca; Pasquale A Margariti; Antonia Testa; Gian Franco Zannoni; Deborah Giordano; Giovanni Scambia; Pasquale Marano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  25 in total

1.  Hybrid versus fusion imaging: are we moving forward judiciously?

Authors:  Luca Giovanella; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Preoperative Assessment of Carcinoma Endometrium-a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Rohini Kulkarni; Rani Akhil Bhat; Vibhawari Dhakharia; Kumar Kallur; Aparna Gangoli
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-20

Review 3.  Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Koji Murakami; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-28

5.  Utility of PET/CT to Evaluate Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results of ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Atri; Zheng Zhang; Farrokh Dehdashti; Susanna I Lee; Helga Marques; Shamshad Ali; Wui-Jin Koh; Robert S Mannel; Paul DiSilvestro; Stephanie A King; Michael Pearl; XunClare Zhou; Marie Plante; Katherine M Moxley; Michael Gold
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-22

8.  Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Francesco Buemi; Alessia Cassarà; Roberta Matheoud; Gian Mauro Sacchetti; Alberto Arnulfo; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Value of integrated PET-IVIM MR in assessing metastases in hypermetabolic pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancer: a multi-parameter study.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Siyao Du; Siyu Zhang; Bo Wang; Chengyan Dong; Hongzan Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review.

Authors:  Ester P Olthof; Maaike A van der Aa; Judit A Adam; Lukas J A Stalpers; Hans H B Wenzel; Jacobus van der Velden; Constantijne H Mom
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.