Literature DB >> 34241726

The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review.

Ester P Olthof1,2, Maaike A van der Aa3, Judit A Adam4, Lukas J A Stalpers5, Hans H B Wenzel3, Jacobus van der Velden6, Constantijne H Mom6.   

Abstract

Correct identification of patients with lymph node metastasis from cervical cancer prior to treatment is of great importance, because it allows more tailored therapy. Patients may be spared unnecessary surgery or extended field radiotherapy if the nodal status can be predicted correctly. This review captures the existing knowledge on the identification of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. The risk of nodal metastases increases per 2009 FIGO stage, with incidences in the pelvic region ranging from 2% (stage IA2) to 14-36% (IB), 38-51% (IIA) and 47% (IIB); and in the para-aortic region ranging from 2 to 5% (stage IB), 10-20% (IIA), 9% (IIB), 13-30% (III) and 50% (IV). In addition, age, tumor size, lymph vascular space invasion, parametrial invasion, depth of stromal invasion, histological type, and histological grade are reported to be independent prognostic factors for the risk of nodal metastases. Furthermore, biomarkers can contribute to predict a patient's nodal status, of which the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is currently the most widely used in squamous cell cervical cancer. Still, pre-treatment lymph node assessment is primarily performed by imaging, of which diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has the highest sensitivity and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography the highest specificity. Imaging results can be combined with clinical parameters in nomograms to increase the accuracy of predicting positives nodes. Despite all the progress regarding pre-treatment prediction of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer in recent years, prediction rates are not robust enough to safely abandon surgical staging of the pelvic or para-aortic region yet.
© 2021. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Cervical cancer; Diagnosis; Incidence; Lymph node metastasis; Risk factors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34241726     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01980-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  41 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Jonathan S Berek; Mauricio Cuello Fredes; Lynette A Denny; Seija Grenman; Kanishka Karunaratne; Sean T Kehoe; Ikuo Konishi; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jaime Prat; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; James Brierley; David Mutch; Denis Querleu; David Cibula; Michael Quinn; Hennie Botha; Lax Sigurd; Laurel Rice; Hee-Sug Ryu; Hextan Ngan; Johanna Mäenpää; Andri Andrijono; Gatot Purwoto; Amita Maheshwari; Uttam D Bafna; Marie Plante; Jayashree Natarajan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  David Cibula; Richard Pötter; François Planchamp; Elisabeth Avall-Lundqvist; Daniela Fischerova; Christine Haie Meder; Christhardt Köhler; Fabio Landoni; Sigurd Lax; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Umesh Mahantshetty; Patrice Mathevet; W Glenn McCluggage; Mary McCormack; Raj Naik; Remi Nout; Sandro Pignata; Jordi Ponce; Denis Querleu; Francesco Raspagliesi; Alexandros Rodolakis; Karl Tamussino; Pauline Wimberger; Maria Rosaria Raspollini
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Prognostic Value of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jeanny Kwon; Keun-Yong Eom; In Ah Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Young-Beom Kim; Jae Hong No; Kidong Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Can pelvic lymphadenectomy be omitted in patients with stage IA2, IB1, and IIA1 squamous cell cervical cancer?

Authors:  Yaxian Wang; Tingting Yao; Jin Yu; Jing Li; Qionghua Chen; Zhongqiu Lin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 6.  What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Njål Lura; Jan Blaakær; Daniela Fischerova; Henrica M J Werner
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 26.763

8.  Preoperative nomogram for the identification of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  D-Y Kim; S-H Shim; S-O Kim; S-W Lee; J-Y Park; D-S Suh; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Tailoring Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Stage IA2, IB1, and IIA1 Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Jing Ran; Zhen-Yu He; Song Quan; Qiong-Hua Chen; San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Validation of the prognostic value of various lymph node staging systems for cervical squamous cell carcinoma following radical surgery: a single-center analysis of 3,732 patients.

Authors:  Qinhao Guo; Jun Zhu; Yong Wu; Hao Wen; Lingfang Xia; Xingzhu Ju; Guihao Ke; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in the Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Shimin Yang; Chunli Liu; Chunbo Li; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.

Authors:  Jiahui Yong; Baicheng Ding; Yaqin Dong; Mingwei Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Identification of Oxidative Stress-Associated Molecular Subtypes and Signature for Predicting Survival Outcome of Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Hui Qu; Xiaolin Ma; Xiaomei Liu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 7.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.