Literature DB >> 19183535

Quantitating the impact of stage migration on staging accuracy in colorectal cancer.

Jukes Namm1, Melody Ng, Sharmila Roy-Chowdhury, John W Morgan, Sharon S Lum, Jan H Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of nodes retrieved is a powerful predictor of survival in node-negative colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether this is because of improved staging or improved surgery, or both, is unclear. We sought to quantitate the impact of stage migration in node-negative colorectal cancer. STUDY
DESIGN: Between January 1994 and December 2003, 7,192 patients in Region 5 of the California Cancer Registry, diagnosed with node-negative or node-positive colorectal cancer, were reviewed. The number of nodes examined, node-positive rate, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean number of nodes examined was 9.3 (range 0 to 89 nodes). The 5-year DSS was 84.5% for N0, 65.2% for N1, and 46.8% for N2 disease. The 5-year DSS difference for those who had more than 12 nodes retrieved was 87.3% (95% CI, 85.2% to 89.3%) and for those with 0 to 3 nodes retrieved, 83.7% (95% CI, 80.6% to 86.82%; p = 0.0009). As the number of retrieved nodes increased, the risk of understaging patients decreased. For 0 to 3 nodes, 78.3% of patients were N0; for 4 to 7 nodes, 67.6%; 8 to 9 nodes, 62.1%; 10 to 12 nodes, 59.5%; and only 57.2% for more than 12 nodes examined. Using more than 12 nodes as the definition of an adequate lymphadenectomy and staging, for apparently N0 patients with 0 to 3 nodes retrieved, DSS survival would be affected by approximately 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in outcomes between CRC patients with limited numbers of nodes harvested and those with more than 12 nodes harvested are substantial. Stage migration alone can explain the entire DSS difference between patients with more than 12 nodes retrieved and those with smaller numbers of nodes retrieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19183535     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Importance of lymph node dissection. Worthy of many questions].

Authors:  D Hölzel; J Engel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Yao-Jen Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting.

Authors:  Peter Ihnát; Patricie Delongová; Jaroslav Horáček; Lucia Ihnát Rudinská; Petr Vávra; Pavel Zonča
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of metastatic lymph node ratio staging system with the 7th AJCC system for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jizhun Zhang; Liang Lv; Yingjiang Ye; Kewei Jiang; Zhanlong Shen; Shan Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Long-term oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; John Huang; Chia-Tung Sun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Colorectal cancer incidence and survival by sub-site and stage of diagnosis: a population-based study at the advent of national screening.

Authors:  J McDevitt; H Comber; P M Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Long-term survival results of surgery alone versus surgery plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for stage II and stage III colon cancer: pooled analysis of NSABP C-01 through C-05. A baseline from which to compare modern adjuvant trials.

Authors:  Neal W Wilkinson; Greg Yothers; Samia Lopa; Joseph P Costantino; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Risk groups defined by Recursive Partitioning Analysis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with colorectal resection.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Yao-Jen Chang; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Prognostic role of the lymph node ratio in node positive colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Ran Zhang; Tian-Hang Xie; Jun-Lin Chi; Yuan Li; Lie Yang; Yong-Yang Yu; Xiao-Feng Sun; Zong-Guang Zhou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08

10.  Role of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in predicting outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C H A Lee; S Wilkins; K Oliva; M P Staples; P J McMurrick
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.