Literature DB >> 19182214

The cost-effectiveness of screening for hereditary hemochromatosis in Germany: a remodeling study.

Wolf H Rogowski1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Genetic tests for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) are currently included in the German ambulatory care reimbursement scheme but only for symptomatic individuals and the offspring of HH patients. This study synthesizes the most current evidence to examine whether screening in the broader population is cost-effective and to identify the best choice of initial and follow-up screening tests.
METHODS: A probabilistic decision-analytic model was constructed to calculate cost per life year gained (LYG) for HH screening among male Caucasians aged 30. Three strategies were considered in both the general population and male offspring of HH patients: phenotypic (transferrin saturation, TS), genotypic (C282Y mutation), and sequential (genotype if TS is elevated) screening.
RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness of sequential screening among male offspring, sequential population-wide screening, and genotypic screening is 41000, 124000, and 161000 Eero/LYG, respectively. All other strategies were subject to simple or extended dominance. The results are subject to high uncertainty. The most influential parameters in the deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis are discounting of life years gained and the adherence of patients to preventive phlebotomy. DISCUSSION: The current German policy of only screening at-risk individuals is consistent with health economic decision making based on typically accepted thresholds. However, conducting the DNA test after the first elevated TS result is more cost-effective than waiting for a second TS result as recommended by the German guidelines. Further empirical work regarding adherence to long-term prevention recommendations and explicit and well-justified guidance for the choice of discount rates in German economic evaluation are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182214     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08327112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  14 in total

1.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

Review 2.  Phenotypic expression of hereditary hemochromatosis: what have we learned from the population studies?

Authors:  Eng K Gan; Oyekoya T Ayonrinde; Debbie Trinder; John K Olynyk
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-02

Review 3.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jörg Schmidtke; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Genome-wide association studies and genetic risk assessment of liver diseases.

Authors:  Marcin Krawczyk; Roman Müllenbach; Susanne N Weber; Vincent Zimmer; Frank Lammert
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?

Authors:  Fernando Antoñanzas; R Rodríguez-Ibeas; M F Hutter; R Lorente; C Juárez; M Pinillos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-20

Review 8.  Screening for iron overload: lessons from the hemochromatosis and iron overload screening (HEIRS) study.

Authors:  Paul Adams; James C Barton; Gordon D McLaren; Ronald T Acton; Mark Speechley; Christine E McLaren; David M Reboussin; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster; Emily L Harris; Beverly M Snively; Thomas Vogt; Phyliss Sholinsky; Elizabeth Thomson; Fitzroy W Dawkins; Victor R Gordeuk; John H Eckfeldt
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Clinical penetrance in hereditary hemochromatosis: estimates of the cumulative incidence of severe liver disease among HFE C282Y homozygotes.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Lyle C Gurrin; Nadine A Bertalli; Katrina J Allen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Issues surrounding the health economic evaluation of genomic technologies.

Authors:  James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth; Anna Schuh
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.