Literature DB >> 19182124

Variation in scatterplot displays.

Michael E Doherty1, Richard B Anderson2.   

Abstract

Scatterplots are typically constructed for the purpose of showing the association between two variables. We argue that such scatterplots should not vary in ways that are unrelated to the degree of association. Noting that the publication standards for the preparation of scatterplots are minimal, we review empirical literature that shows that a number of arbitrary features of scatterplots influence the inferences drawn by users. We discuss nine such features. We also review the literature that recommends how scatterplots should be prepared, and we examine 221 scatterplots published in recent journals. There was considerable variation among those published scatterplots. This article concludes with a call for further standardization by way of flexible guidelines.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182124     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  3 in total

1.  Antral follicle count: absence of significant midlife decline.

Authors:  Mitchell P Rosen; Barbara Sternfeld; Sonya M Schuh-Huerta; Renee A Reijo Pera; Charles E McCulloch; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Informal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Jiexiang Li; Christian Conley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Consequences of common data analysis inaccuracies in CNS trauma injury basic research.

Authors:  Darlene A Burke; Scott R Whittemore; David S K Magnuson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.269

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.