Literature DB >> 19181747

Molecular phylogenetics and the evolution of fruit and leaf morphology of Dichaea (Orchidaceae: Zygopetalinae).

Kurt M Neubig1, Norris H Williams, W Mark Whitten, Franco Pupulin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The orchid genus Dichaea, with over 100 species found throughout the neotropics, is easily recognized by distichous leaves on long stems without pseudobulbs and flowers with infrastigmatic ligules. The genus has previously been divided into four sections based primarily on presence of ovary bristles and a foliar abscission layer. The aim of this work is to use DNA sequence data to estimate phylogenetic relationships within Dichaea and map the distribution of major morphological characters that have been used to delimit subgenera/sections.
METHODS: Sequence data for the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and plastid matK, trnL intron, trnL-F spacer and ycf1 for 67 ingroup and seven outgroup operational taxonomic units were used to estimate phylogenetic relationships within Dichaea. Taxa from each of the four sections were sampled, with the greatest representation from section Dichaea, the most diverse and taxonomically puzzling group. KEY
RESULTS: Molecular data and morphology support monophyly of Dichaea. Results indicate that section Dichaeopsis is polyphyletic and based on symplesiomorphies, including deciduous leaves and smooth ovaries that are widespread in Zygopetalinae. There are at least three well-supported clades within section Dichaeopsis. Section Pseudodichaea is monophyletic and defined by setose ovaries and leaves with an abscission layer. Sections Dichaea and Dichaeastrum are monophyletic and defined by pendent habit and persistent leaves. Section Dichaeastrum, distinguished from section Dichaea primarily by a glabrous ovary, is potentially polyphyletic.
CONCLUSIONS: The leaf abscission layer was lost once, occurring only in the derived sections Dichaea and Dichaeastrum. The setose fruit is a more homoplasious character with several losses and gains within the genus. We propose an informal division of the genus based upon five well-supported clades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181747      PMCID: PMC2720659          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  10 in total

1.  Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence.

Authors:  W M Whitten; N H Williams; M W Chase
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae.

Authors:  S W Graham; J R Kohn; B R Morton; J E Eckenwalder; S C Barrett
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Utility of plastid psaB gene sequences for investigating intrafamilial relationships within Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Kenneth M Cameron
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.

Authors:  P Taberlet; L Gielly; G Pautou; J Bouvet
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Labellar micromorphology of two euglossine-pollinated orchid genera; Scuticaria Lindl. and Dichaea Lindl.

Authors:  Kevin L Davies; Malgorzata Stpiczynska
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA.

Authors:  Y Sun; D Z Skinner; G H Liang; S H Hulbert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Molecular phylogenetics of Maxillaria and related genera (Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on combined molecular data sets.

Authors:  W Mark Whitten; Mario A Blanco; Norris H Williams; Samantha Koehler; Germán Carnevali; Rodrigo B Singer; Lorena Endara; Kurt M Neubig
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions.

Authors:  G Reeves; M W Chase; P Goldblatt; P Rudall; M F Fay; A V Cox; B Lejeune; T Souza-Chies
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcL nucleotide.

Authors:  K M Cameron; M W Chase; W M Whitten; P J Kores; D C Jarrell; V A Albert; T Yukawa; H G Hills; D H Goldman
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.844

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Orchid biology: from Linnaeus via Darwin to the 21st century. Preface.

Authors:  Michael F Fay; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The dilemma of being a fragrant flower: the major floral volatile attracts pollinators and florivores in the euglossine-pollinated orchid Dichaea pendula.

Authors:  Carlos E P Nunes; Maria Fernanda G V Peñaflor; José Maurício S Bento; Marcos José Salvador; Marlies Sazima
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Parentage determination of Vanda Miss Joaquim (Orchidaceae) through two chloroplast genes rbcL and matK.

Authors:  Gillian Su-Wen Khew; Tet Fatt Chia
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution.

Authors:  Maria Alejandra Serna-Sánchez; Oscar A Pérez-Escobar; Diego Bogarín; María Fernanda Torres-Jimenez; Astrid Catalina Alvarez-Yela; Juliana E Arcila-Galvis; Climbie F Hall; Fábio de Barros; Fábio Pinheiro; Steven Dodsworth; Mark W Chase; Alexandre Antonelli; Tatiana Arias
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.