BACKGROUND: Several non-invasive wound-closure devices are available. Clinical studies of low-tension lacerations suggest similar clinical outcomes with these devices. OBJECTIVE: We compared the wound-bursting strengths (WBS) of octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond), butyl-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl Blue), and adhesive tape (Steri-Strips). METHODS: Design-randomized, controlled, blinded experiment. Setting-university-based division of laboratory animal research. Subjects-15 Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250-350 g. Interventions-standardized 2-cm full-thickness incisions were made in duplicate on both sides of the rat's dorsum with a #15 surgical blade and closed with one of the three study wound-closure devices following manufacturer instructions. The order of closure was randomized. Measurements-WBS was measured after wound closure with a validated vacuum-controlled wound chamber device (BT-2000) that measures the pressure required to disrupt the closed wound. Data analysis-between-group comparisons were performed with pair-wise t-tests and chi-squared tests. This study had 80% power to detect a 75-mm Hg between-group difference in WBS (two-tailed alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: We evaluated 30 incisions in 15 rats. The mean WBS of octyl-cyanoacrylate (298 +/- 58 mm Hg) was significantly higher than that of butyl-cyanoacrylate (199 +/- 87 mm Hg; difference 98 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 32-165], p = 0.006) or Steri-Strips (129 +/- 67 mm Hg; difference 169 mm Hg [95% CI 112-227], p < 0.001). The WBS of butyl-cyanoacrylate was stronger than that of Steri-Strips; difference 71 mm Hg (95% CI 4-138), p = 0.035. CONCLUSIONS: Octyl-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive has a higher WBS than butyl-cyanoacrylate, whose WBS is greater than that of surgical tape. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Several non-invasive wound-closure devices are available. Clinical studies of low-tension lacerations suggest similar clinical outcomes with these devices. OBJECTIVE: We compared the wound-bursting strengths (WBS) of octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond), butyl-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl Blue), and adhesive tape (Steri-Strips). METHODS: Design-randomized, controlled, blinded experiment. Setting-university-based division of laboratory animal research. Subjects-15 Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250-350 g. Interventions-standardized 2-cm full-thickness incisions were made in duplicate on both sides of the rat's dorsum with a #15 surgical blade and closed with one of the three study wound-closure devices following manufacturer instructions. The order of closure was randomized. Measurements-WBS was measured after wound closure with a validated vacuum-controlled wound chamber device (BT-2000) that measures the pressure required to disrupt the closed wound. Data analysis-between-group comparisons were performed with pair-wise t-tests and chi-squared tests. This study had 80% power to detect a 75-mm Hg between-group difference in WBS (two-tailed alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: We evaluated 30 incisions in 15 rats. The mean WBS of octyl-cyanoacrylate (298 +/- 58 mm Hg) was significantly higher than that of butyl-cyanoacrylate (199 +/- 87 mm Hg; difference 98 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 32-165], p = 0.006) or Steri-Strips (129 +/- 67 mm Hg; difference 169 mm Hg [95% CI 112-227], p < 0.001). The WBS of butyl-cyanoacrylate was stronger than that of Steri-Strips; difference 71 mm Hg (95% CI 4-138), p = 0.035. CONCLUSIONS:Octyl-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive has a higher WBS than butyl-cyanoacrylate, whose WBS is greater than that of surgical tape. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Gemma Pascual; Sandra Sotomayor; Marta Rodríguez; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Andreé Kühnhardt; Mar Fernández-Gutiérrez; Julio San Román; Juan Manuel Bellón Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Young Ju Lee; Gyeong Bok Jung; Samjin Choi; Gihyun Lee; Ji Hye Kim; Ho Sung Son; Hyunsu Bae; Hun-Kuk Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 3.240