Literature DB >> 19181429

Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials.

James L Drummond1, Lihong Lin, Lulwa A Al-Turki, Ryan K Hurley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The intent of the project was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of particle and fiber filled dental composites that are fabricated either directly or indirectly using a notched specimen with respect to the number of cycles until failure.
METHODS: The materials were five dental composites, three normally cured in the oral cavity (Restolux, Renew and Filtek Supreme), direct processing, and two laboratory produced (BelleGlass, and Tescera), indirect processing. The specimens were 3mmx3mmx25mm bars with a 0.75 or 1.0mm notch in the mid-span of the bars, polished with 320 grit SiC paper and aged for 6 months in air, distilled water, artificial saliva, and a 50/50 mixture of ethanol and distilled water. Testing was performed with a stress mean range of 5-49MPa, the maximum number of cycles was 100,000, and the number of cycles to failure was recorded.
RESULTS: For the specimens that failed, BelleGlass, Restolux, and Tescera were able to withstand a higher cyclic loaded stress than Renew and Filtek. The 50/50 by volume mixture of water and ethanol resulted in the lowest resistance to fatigue for all materials.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the dental composite materials investigated, the indirect processed and those with large particle fillers (higher weight percent filler) had better cyclic fatigue resistance than micro- and nano-particle fillers (lower weight percent filler).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181429     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  9 in total

1.  On the fatigue behavior of resin-dentin bonds after degradation by biofilm.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Ke Zhang; Heonjune Ryou; Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Hessam Majd; Hockin H K Xu; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-11-17

2.  Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites.

Authors:  D Khvostenko; J C Mitchell; T J Hilton; J L Ferracane; J J Kruzic
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Fatigue testing of biomaterials and their interfaces.

Authors:  Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  On the durability of resin-dentin bonds: Identifying the weakest links.

Authors:  Zihou Zhang; Dylan Beitzel; Mustafa Mutluay; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Mohamed M Mokhtar; Dina S Farahat; Waleed Eldars; Manal F Osman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-05-01

6.  Cyclic loading of notched dental composite specimens.

Authors:  Lihong Lin; James L Drummond
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Flexural Properties and Elastic Modulus of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials: Evaluation after Exposure to Acidic Drink.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Marco Bollardi; Marco Chiesa; Claudio Poggio; Marco Colombo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effects of aging and light-curing unit type on the volume and internal porosity of bulk-fill resin composite restoration.

Authors:  Afnan O Al-Zain; Elaf A Alboloshi; Walaa A Amir; Maryam A Alghilan; Eliseu A Münchow
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2022-01-19

9.  The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials.

Authors:  Esra Can Say; Haktan Yurdagüven; Özlem Malkondu; Nimet Ünlü; Mübin Soyman; Ender Kazazoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.