Lihong Lin1, James L Drummond. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612-7212, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the fracture toughness (K(IC)) of three direct dental composites and one indirect dental composite subject to cyclic loading. METHODS: The composites were a micro-filled (Micronew, Bisco INC., Schaumburg, IL, USA), a hybrid (Renew, Bisco INC.), a nano-filled composite (Filtek Supreme Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and an indirect dental composite (BelleGlass HP, SDS-Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Rectangular bar specimens (3 mm x 3 mm x 25 mm) were fabricated, notched, aged (5 months) and cyclic loaded in four different environments, air, water, artificial saliva, and a 50/50 by volume mixture of ethanol and water. Specimens were cyclic loaded for 1, 1000, 10,000, and 100,000 cycles. RESULTS: A 3-way ANOVA (non-aged and aged group, four aging media, four loading cycles) showed a significant difference between non-aged and aged, aging media, and loading cycles. For the control groups as the number of cycles increased, there were no significant differences on the number of cycles completed and fracture toughness, except for Micronew, which showed an increased specimen failure rate and decreased fracture toughness. In the aged groups, cyclic loading in water and artificial saliva did not have a significant effect on BelleGlass HP, Filtek Supreme Plus and Renew for fracture toughness and the number of cycles completed, However for Renew in the 50/50 mixture at 100,000 cycles, Filtek Supreme Plus in air and the 50/50 mixture, and Micronew, there was an increased specimen failure rate and a decreased fracture toughness during cyclic fatigue loading as the number of cycles increased. SIGNIFICANCE: BelleGlass HP displayed the best overall resistance to cyclic loading, followed by Renew and Filtek Supreme Plus, and Micronew. Copyright 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the fracture toughness (K(IC)) of three direct dental composites and one indirect dental composite subject to cyclic loading. METHODS: The composites were a micro-filled (Micronew, Bisco INC., Schaumburg, IL, USA), a hybrid (Renew, Bisco INC.), a nano-filled composite (Filtek Supreme Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and an indirect dental composite (BelleGlass HP, SDS-Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Rectangular bar specimens (3 mm x 3 mm x 25 mm) were fabricated, notched, aged (5 months) and cyclic loaded in four different environments, air, water, artificial saliva, and a 50/50 by volume mixture of ethanol and water. Specimens were cyclic loaded for 1, 1000, 10,000, and 100,000 cycles. RESULTS: A 3-way ANOVA (non-aged and aged group, four aging media, four loading cycles) showed a significant difference between non-aged and aged, aging media, and loading cycles. For the control groups as the number of cycles increased, there were no significant differences on the number of cycles completed and fracture toughness, except for Micronew, which showed an increased specimen failure rate and decreased fracture toughness. In the aged groups, cyclic loading in water and artificial saliva did not have a significant effect on BelleGlass HP, Filtek Supreme Plus and Renew for fracture toughness and the number of cycles completed, However for Renew in the 50/50 mixture at 100,000 cycles, Filtek Supreme Plus in air and the 50/50 mixture, and Micronew, there was an increased specimen failure rate and a decreased fracture toughness during cyclic fatigue loading as the number of cycles increased. SIGNIFICANCE: BelleGlass HP displayed the best overall resistance to cyclic loading, followed by Renew and Filtek Supreme Plus, and Micronew. Copyright 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Ulrich Lohbauer; Tina von der Horst; Roland Frankenberger; Norbert Krämer; Anselm Petschelt Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Hamad Algamaiah; Robert Danso; Jeffrey Banas; Steve R Armstrong; Kyumin Whang; H Ralph Rawls; Erica C Teixeira Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Ke Zhang; Eric J Wu; Sarah M Xu; Xuedong Zhou; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 5.304