Literature DB >> 19889450

Cyclic loading of notched dental composite specimens.

Lihong Lin1, James L Drummond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the fracture toughness (K(IC)) of three direct dental composites and one indirect dental composite subject to cyclic loading.
METHODS: The composites were a micro-filled (Micronew, Bisco INC., Schaumburg, IL, USA), a hybrid (Renew, Bisco INC.), a nano-filled composite (Filtek Supreme Plus, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and an indirect dental composite (BelleGlass HP, SDS-Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Rectangular bar specimens (3 mm x 3 mm x 25 mm) were fabricated, notched, aged (5 months) and cyclic loaded in four different environments, air, water, artificial saliva, and a 50/50 by volume mixture of ethanol and water. Specimens were cyclic loaded for 1, 1000, 10,000, and 100,000 cycles.
RESULTS: A 3-way ANOVA (non-aged and aged group, four aging media, four loading cycles) showed a significant difference between non-aged and aged, aging media, and loading cycles. For the control groups as the number of cycles increased, there were no significant differences on the number of cycles completed and fracture toughness, except for Micronew, which showed an increased specimen failure rate and decreased fracture toughness. In the aged groups, cyclic loading in water and artificial saliva did not have a significant effect on BelleGlass HP, Filtek Supreme Plus and Renew for fracture toughness and the number of cycles completed, However for Renew in the 50/50 mixture at 100,000 cycles, Filtek Supreme Plus in air and the 50/50 mixture, and Micronew, there was an increased specimen failure rate and a decreased fracture toughness during cyclic fatigue loading as the number of cycles increased. SIGNIFICANCE: BelleGlass HP displayed the best overall resistance to cyclic loading, followed by Renew and Filtek Supreme Plus, and Micronew. Copyright 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889450      PMCID: PMC2819542          DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  17 in total

1.  An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials.

Authors:  Sumita B Mitra; Dong Wu; Brian N Holmes
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives.

Authors:  Ulrich Lohbauer; Tina von der Horst; Roland Frankenberger; Norbert Krämer; Anselm Petschelt
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique.

Authors:  E Asmussen; A Peutzfeldt
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1990-12

4.  Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography.

Authors:  J L Ferracane; J R Condon
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement.

Authors:  F J Burke; N H Wilson; S W Cheung; I A Mjör
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials.

Authors:  R A Draughn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 7.  Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies.

Authors:  M Braem; P Lambrechts; G Vanherle
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations.

Authors:  B Köhler; C G Rasmusson; P Odman
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Fatigue behavior of packable composites.

Authors:  Y Abe; M J A Braem; Paul Lambrechts; S Inoue; M Takeuchi; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Evaluation of fracture toughness of a fiber containing dental composite after flexural fatigue.

Authors:  James L Drummond; Lihong Lin; Klaus J Miescke
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of aging methods on the fracture toughness and physical stability of an oxirane/acrylate, ormocer, and Bis-GMA-based resin composites.

Authors:  Hamad Algamaiah; Robert Danso; Jeffrey Banas; Steve R Armstrong; Kyumin Whang; H Ralph Rawls; Erica C Teixeira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Curing efficiency of modern LED units.

Authors:  Adam Rencz; Reinhard Hickel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel; Anca Silvia Valceanu; Karin Christine Huth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental plaque microcosm biofilm behavior on calcium phosphate nanocomposite with quaternary ammonium.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Ke Zhang; Eric J Wu; Sarah M Xu; Xuedong Zhou; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials.

Authors:  Esra Can Say; Haktan Yurdagüven; Özlem Malkondu; Nimet Ünlü; Mübin Soyman; Ender Kazazoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.