Literature DB >> 19179922

Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty.

Takashi Shiozaki1, Hironori Otsuka, Yoshihiro Nakata, Toru Yokoyama, Kazunari Takeuchi, Atsushi Ono, Takuya Numasawa, Kanichiro Wada, Satoshi Toh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study in 19 patients after cervical laminoplasty, using magnetic resonance imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of spinal cord shift at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative C5 palsy is a noticeable complication within 1 week after cervical laminoplasty. The root tethering due to the posterior shift of the spinal cord after laminoplasty was reported as one of the causes of C5 palsy. However, the spinal cord shift after surgery within 1 week is unknown.
METHODS: The posterior shift of the spinal cord was measured in 19 consecutive patients on magnetic resonance images at 24 hours and 2 weeks after cervical laminoplasty.
RESULTS: The mean posterior shift of the spinal cord at 24 hours was 2.8 mm, with the maximum at the C5 level, decreasing to 1.9 mm at 2 weeks. The posterior shift of the spinal cord at C5 was correlated with the amount of the dura mater at C4, C5, and C6 levels. In a patient with right C5 palsy, posterior shift at C5 level was 5.5 mm, decreasing to 3.0 mm at 2 weeks after surgery. The posterior shift of the spinal cord was not correlated with the sagittal alignment.
CONCLUSION: The posterior shift of the spinal cord at 24 hours had a tendency to shift more posteriorly than that observed at 2 weeks after cervical laminoplasty. C5 palsy may be prevented if the expansion of dura mater, which is strongly correlated with the posterior shift, can be controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19179922     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases.

Authors:  Satoshi Nori; Ryoma Aoyama; Ken Ninomiya; Junichi Yamane; Kazuya Kitamura; Seiji Ueda; Tateru Shiraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Complications of surgical interventions on the spinal column].

Authors:  L Leue; R Kothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Can intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cervical spine decompression predict post-operative segmental C5 palsy?

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi; Donald J Blaskiewicz; Bertha Ramirez; Richard Zhang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

6.  C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Lee; Jae-Sung Ahn; Byungkon Shin; Hoseok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Factors that regulate spinal cord position after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Kazuhiro Chiba; Takashi Asazuma; Hideaki Imabayashi; Naobumi Hosogane; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-29

8.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Authors:  Chae-Hong Lim; Sung-Woo Roh; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sang-Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Recep Basaran; Tuncay Kaner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.