Literature DB >> 19179821

Are screening guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysms being implemented within a large VA primary health care system?

Daniel G Federman1, Vera G Carbone, Jeffrey D Kravetz, Sue Kancir, Robert S Kirsner, Dawn M Bravata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been recommended to reduce AAA-related mortality. However, it is unknown whether the evidence-based recommendation has been implemented within primary care.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether screening for AAA is being performed within a large Veterans Affairs (VA) primary health care system.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study examining AAA screening practices within the VA Connecticut Healthcare System. Any of the following imaging procedures were considered screening tests for AAA: abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen, CT colography, or magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen.
RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were included in the cohort: 83 (30%) were offered screening for AAA or had recent imaging performed that would have allowed for detection of an AAA. Seventy-three patients (26%) underwent AAA screening or had recent imaging of their abdomens, while 10 patients either refused imaging or were awaiting ultrasonographic screening at the time of this study. Of the 73 patients who had undergone screening or other abdominal imaging evaluations, 9 (12.3%) were found to have AAAs.
CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a low rate of screening for AAA within 1 primary care setting in a large VA health care system. If this finding is replicated within other VA primary health care settings, then the VA health care system should consider implementing a performance metric within primary care to improve AAA screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19179821     DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2009.01.1962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0032-5481            Impact factor:   3.840


  6 in total

1.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening during transthoracic echocardiography: Cardiologist and vascular medicine specialist interpretation.

Authors:  E Viviana Navas; Andrea McCalla-Lewis; Bernardo B Fernandez; Sergio L Pinski; Gian M Novaro; Craig R Asher
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-26

2.  Office-based ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Beau Blois
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Effect of visit length and a clinical decision support tool on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in a primary care practice.

Authors:  John Eaton; Darcy Reed; Kurt B Angstman; Kris Thomas; Frederick North; Robert Stroebel; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Population risk factor estimates for abdominal aortic aneurysm from electronic medical records: a case control study.

Authors:  Diane T Smelser; Gerard Tromp; James R Elmore; Helena Kuivaniemi; David P Franklin; H Lester Kirchner; David J Carey
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Impact of Implicit Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System Over 10 Years.

Authors:  Joseph R Leach; Hui Shen; Eugene Huo; Thomas A Hope; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Mary A Whooley; Michael D Hope
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Abdominal aorta measurements by a handheld ultrasound device compared with a conventional cart-based ultrasound machine.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alfuraih; Abdulaziz I Alrashed; Saleh O Almazyad; Mohammed J Alsaadi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.