Literature DB >> 19177376

Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.

Kenneth C Hisley1, Larry D Anderson, Stacy E Smith, Stephen M Kavic, J Kathleen Tracy.   

Abstract

This research effort compared and contrasted two conceptually different methods for the exploration of human anatomy in the first-year dissection laboratory by accomplished students: "physical" dissection using an embalmed cadaver and "digital" dissection using three-dimensional volume modeling of whole-body CT and MRI image sets acquired using the same cadaver. The goal was to understand the relative contributions each method makes toward student acquisition of intuitive sense of practical anatomical knowledge gained during "hands-on" structural exploration tasks. The main instruments for measuring anatomical knowledge under this conceptual model were questions generated using a classification system designed to assess both visual presentation manner and the corresponding response information required. Students were randomly divided into groups based on exploration method (physical or digital dissection) and then anatomical region. The physical dissectors proceeded with their direct methods, whereas the digital dissectors generated and manipulated indirect 3D digital models. After 6 weeks, corresponding student anatomical assignment teams compared their results using photography and animated digital visualizations. Finally, to see whether each method provided unique advantages, a visual test protocol of new visualizations based on the classification schema was administered. Results indicated that all students, regardless of gender, dissection method, and anatomical region dissected performed significantly better on questions presented as rotating models requiring spatial ordering or viewpoint determination responses in contrast to requests for specific lexical feature identifications. Additional results provided evidence of trends showing significant differences in gender and dissection method scores. These trends will be explored with further trials with larger populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19177376     DOI: 10.1002/ase.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  11 in total

1.  Cadaver-specific CT scans visualized at the dissection table combined with virtual dissection tables improve learning performance in general gross anatomy.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Frederik L Giesel; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Thomas Kuner; Sara Doll
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Creation of a Virtual Anatomy System based on Chinese Visible Human data sets.

Authors:  Binji Fang; Yi Wu; Chun Chu; Ying Li; Na Luo; Kaijun Liu; Liwen Tan; Shaoxiang Zhang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  A Novel Cadaveric Embalming Technique for Enhancing Visualisation of Human Anatomy.

Authors:  Brian Thompson; Emily Green; Kayleigh Scotcher; Iain D Keenan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Evaluating the Anatomage Table Compared to Cadaveric Dissection as a Learning Modality for Gross Anatomy.

Authors:  Guy Baratz; Amy L Wilson-Delfosse; Bryan M Singelyn; Kevin C Allan; Gabrielle E Rieth; Rubina Ratnaparkhi; Brenden P Jenks; Caitlin Carlton; Barbara K Freeman; Susanne Wish-Baratz
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 5.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

Review 6.  The value of postmortem experience in undergraduate medical education: current perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Bamber; Thelma A Quince
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-03-11

7.  Integrated virtual and cadaveric dissection laboratories enhance first year medical students' anatomy experience: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Darras; Rebecca Spouge; Rose Hatala; Savvas Nicolaou; Jeff Hu; Anne Worthington; Claudia Krebs; Bruce B Forster
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Musculoskeletal anatomy: evaluation and comparison of common teaching and learning modalities.

Authors:  Aristeidis Zibis; Vasileios Mitrousias; Sokratis Varitimidis; Vasileios Raoulis; Apostolos Fyllos; Dimitrios Arvanitis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gesture-controlled interactive three dimensional anatomy: a novel teaching tool in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Jordan B Hochman; Bertram Unger; Jay Kraut; Justyn Pisa; Sabine Hombach-Klonisch
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-10-07

10.  Modeling and simulation of an anatomy teaching system.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Zhang; Jingyi Yang; Na Chen; Shaoxiang Zhang; Yifa Xu; Liwen Tan
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.