Literature DB >> 6223509

Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans.

P Schantz, E Randall-Fox, W Hutchison, A Tydén, P O Astrand.   

Abstract

The relationship between maximum voluntary concentric strength, muscle fibre type distribution and muscle cross-sectional areas were examined in 23 subjects (7 female and 11 male phys. ed. students as well as 5 male bodybuilders). Maximal knee and elbow extension as well as elbow flexion torque at the angular velocities 30, 90 and 180 degrees per second was measured. Muscle biopsies were taken from vastus lateralis and m. triceps brachii. The muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh and upper arm was measured with computed tomography scanning. The maximal torque correlated strongly to the muscle cross-sectional area times an approximative measure on the lever arm (body height). Maximal tension developed per unit of muscle cross-sectional area did not correlate significantly with per cent type I fibre area and did not differ between the female and male students or bodybuilders. Neither did the relative decrease in torque with increasing contraction velocity show any significant relationship to the per cent type I fibre area. The total number of muscle fibres was estimated by dividing the muscle cross-sectional area with the mean fibre area of m. triceps brachii. The number of fibres did not seem to differ between the sexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6223509     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6772


  75 in total

1.  Velocity associated characteristics of force production in college weight lifters.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise.

Authors:  K Hainaut; J Duchateau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Knee extensor performance in runners. Differences between specific athletes and implications for injury prevention.

Authors:  C Johansson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  A quantitative study of the histochemical and morphometric characteristics of the human cricopharyngeus muscle.

Authors:  H Brownlow; I Whitmore; P L Willan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Peak oxygen uptake during running and arm cranking normalized to total and regional skeletal muscle mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Sanada; Charles F Kearns; Kosuke Kojima; Takashi Abe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development.

Authors:  Lars L Andersen; Per Aagaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Neuromuscular adaptations to detraining following resistance training in previously untrained subjects.

Authors:  Lars L Andersen; Jesper L Andersen; S Peter Magnusson; Per Aagaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Lactate kinetics in handcycling under various exercise modalities and their relationship to performance measures in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Oliver J Quittmann; Thomas Abel; Sebastian Zeller; Tina Foitschik; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Sex difference in force generation capacity during repeated maximal knee extensions.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; H Okuyama; S Ikegawa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

10.  The force-velocity relationship of arm flexion in untrained males and females and arm-trained athletes.

Authors:  F L de Koning; R A Binkhorst; J A Vos; M A van 't Hof
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1985
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.