BACKGROUND: This study examines the use of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) to screen for childhood psychiatric disorder based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (DISC-IV) classifications of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety (SAD), generalized anxiety (GAD) and major depression (MDD). METHODS: Data for analysis come from a sample of 399 children and adolescents aged 5-17 years old referred to child mental health outpatient services in three Ontario cities. Mothers were administered the BCFPI on three occasions: baseline, 2 and 13 months; and the DISC-IV on two occasions: 1 and 12 months. RESULTS: Based on kappa, test-retest reliability for disorders classified by the BCFPI exceeded .50 for all conditions except MDD (.45). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area-under-the-curve (AUC) estimates for BCFPI scale score associations with DISC-IV classifications of disorder exceeded .80 for CD, ODD, ADHD and SAD; and were lower for GAD (.76) and MDD (.75). In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in AUC estimates for boys versus girls and 5 to 11 versus 12 to 17-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: Classifications of childhood disorder derived from the BCFPI provided a reasonable approximation to disorders classified by the DISC-IV administered by lay interviewers.
BACKGROUND: This study examines the use of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) to screen for childhood psychiatric disorder based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (DISC-IV) classifications of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety (SAD), generalized anxiety (GAD) and major depression (MDD). METHODS: Data for analysis come from a sample of 399 children and adolescents aged 5-17 years old referred to child mental health outpatient services in three Ontario cities. Mothers were administered the BCFPI on three occasions: baseline, 2 and 13 months; and the DISC-IV on two occasions: 1 and 12 months. RESULTS: Based on kappa, test-retest reliability for disorders classified by the BCFPI exceeded .50 for all conditions except MDD (.45). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area-under-the-curve (AUC) estimates for BCFPI scale score associations with DISC-IV classifications of disorder exceeded .80 for CD, ODD, ADHD and SAD; and were lower for GAD (.76) and MDD (.75). In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in AUC estimates for boys versus girls and 5 to 11 versus 12 to 17-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: Classifications of childhood disorder derived from the BCFPI provided a reasonable approximation to disorders classified by the DISC-IV administered by lay interviewers.
Authors: Charles E Cunningham; Yvonne Chen; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Patrick McGrath; Graham Reid; Ellen Lipman; Penny Corkum Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2013-08
Authors: Janine V Olthuis; Patrick J McGrath; Charles E Cunningham; Michael H Boyle; Patricia Lingley-Pottie; Graham J Reid; Alexa Bagnell; Ellen L Lipman; Karen Turner; Penny Corkum; Sherry H Stewart; Patrick Berrigan; Kathy Sdao-Jarvie Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2018-11
Authors: Frances A Wymbs; Charles E Cunningham; Yvonne Chen; Heather M Rimas; Ken Deal; Daniel A Waschbusch; William E Pelham Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2015-02-20
Authors: Steven Cook; Alan W Leschied; Jeff St Pierre; Shannon L Stewart; Wendy den Dunnen; Andrew M Johnson Journal: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-05
Authors: Michèle Preyde; Hanna Watkins; Nicklaus Csuzdi; Jeff Carter; Kelly Lazure; Sara White; Randy Penney; Graham Ashbourne; Gary Cameron; Karen Frensch Journal: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2012-11