Literature DB >> 19174291

Neonatal immunology.

Victor S Cortese1.   

Abstract

The field of neonatal immunology and calf vaccination is going through a revolution in veterinary medicine. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of basic neonatal immunology and principles of vaccination as they relate to beef and dairy calves. Opinions on when and what to vaccinate calves for vary widely among experts; therefore, this article focuses primarily on the documented literature. It is likely that vaccination approaches that might be effective or economic for one herd may not work for another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19174291      PMCID: PMC7126137          DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract        ISSN: 0749-0720            Impact factor:   3.357


The field of neonatal immunology continues to be an area of active research in human and veterinary medicine. New and advanced methods for assessing immune status and function are being used widely to re-evaluate some of the old beliefs about the young animal's immune system. Although much more research is still needed, these new studies are shedding light on a mysterious and critical time in the immunologically frail newborn.

Development of the prenatal immune system

The immune system of all species of mammals begins development fairly early in gestation. As the fetus grows, the immune system goes through many changes as cells appear and become specialized. In general, the shorter the gestation period, the less developed the immune system is at birth. The fetus does become immunocompetent while in utero to many diseases, however. In calves, this has been demonstrated with a wide variety of diseases.2, 3, 4, 5 For these types of diseases, precolostral titers from the neonate can be used for diagnostic determination of fetal exposures. The primordial thymus can be seen in fetal lambs and calves between days 27 and 30 of gestation as an epithelial chord.6, 7 As a percentage of body weight, the thymus reaches its maximum size near midgestation and then rapidly decreases after birth. Actual regression of the thymus begins around puberty, and the extent and speed at which it regresses vary by husbandry practices and genetics. By the time of first heat cycle, the thymus' function as an immune gland is almost completely gone. The cells that initially infiltrate the thymus are of unknown origin, but thymic development and differentiation of thymocytes into specific T cell lines occur during gestation. Some of this development and differentiation can occur in secondary lymphoid organs as well. B cells, by contrast, develop and differentiate in the fetal bone marrow. There is a steady increase in the peripheral lymphocytes throughout gestation. Most of these circulating fetal lymphocytes are T cells. At the same time that lymphocytes are developing in the fetus, development and expansion of other white blood cell populations are occurring.

Neonatal immune system

The immune system is fully developed, albeit immature, in the neonate at the time of birth. Susceptibility of newborns to pathogens is not attributable to any inherent inability to mount an immune response but is caused by the fact that their immune system is unprimed. Although there are greater numbers of phagocytic cells in the neonate, the function of these cells is decreased (in calves, these deficiencies are found up to 4 months of age). Complement is from 12% to 60% of adult levels at birth. Complement does not reach adult levels in calves until they are 6 months of age. There is a slow maturation of the immune system in mammals. As an animal approaches sexual maturity and begins to cycle, the immune system also matures. In cattle, most of the immune system maturity is seen by 5 to 8 months of age. For example, T cells (CD4+, CD8+ and TCRγδ+ cells) do not reach peak levels until the animal is 8 months of age. This does not mean that a young calf cannot respond to antigens, but the response is weaker, slower, and easier to overcome. For all practical purposes, this immaturity may lead to moderation of disease rather than to complete prevention. Because the placenta is of the epitheliochorial type in food animal species (eg, cattle, pigs, sheep), there is no transplacental transfer of antibodies or white blood cells. Therefore, no discussion on bovine neonatal immunology is complete without a discussion on an important component of the newborn calf's defense mechanism, colostrum.

Colostrum

Colostrum is the most important example of passive immunity. Defined as the “first” secretions from the mammary gland present after birth, colostrum has many known and unknown properties and components. The information on the short- and long-term impacts of colostrum in calves continues to grow. Not only does good passive transfer have an impact on morbidity and mortality in the young calf,12, 13, 14 but it has a positive impact on long-term health and production.15, 16, 17 Constituents of colostrum include concentrated levels of antibodies and many of the immune cells (B cells, CD cells, macrophages, and neutrophils), which are fully functional after absorption by the calf. Additional components of the immune system, such as interferon, are transferred by means of colostrum, along with many important nutrients. The primary colostral antibody in most domestic species is IgG; in ruminants, this is further defined as IgG1. The functions of the various cells found in colostrum are still undergoing much research. The cells are known to enhance defense mechanisms in the newborn animal in the following ways: transfer of cell-mediated immunity, enhanced passive transfer of immunoglobins, local bactericidal and phagocytic activity in the digestive tract, and increased lymphocyte activity.12, 21 Research in swine has shown higher absorption of these white blood cells when the sow is the true dam as compared with grafted piglets. Similar studies have not been done in ruminants. These cells are destroyed by freezing and naturally disappear from the calf between 3 and 5 weeks of age. The long-term impact of these cells on health or production of calves is not well understood at this time.

Colostrum absorption

When calves are born, the epithelial cells that line the digestive tract allow absorption of colostral proteins by means of pinocytosis. As soon as the digestive tract is stimulated by ingestion of any material, this population of cells begins to change to those that no longer permit absorption. By 6 hours after birth, only approximately 50% of the absorptive capacity remains; by 8 hours, 33%; and by 24 hours, no absorption is typically seen. Colostrum transfer is thus a function of quality and quantity of the colostrum in addition to the timing of colostral administration. In the Holstein breed, the first feeding should be a minimum of 3 qt (3 L) and preferably 4 qt of high-quality clean colostrum. Also, colostrum high in red blood cells may exacerbate any diarrhea caused by gram-negative bacteria. In spite of all the information regarding the importance of colostrum administration to the calf, some degree of failure of passive transfer is common even in beef calves.13, 23 Colostral supplements are available, in addition to products for oral or systemic administration, that contain specific antibodies or general IgG concentrations. There is tremendous variability in the IgG concentration of colostral supplements. Although mixed results pertaining to the efficacy of these products have been observed, they may have significant value in decreasing the mortality or the severity of disease in colostrum-deprived calves.

Vaccination to improve colostral quality

It has long been thought that vaccines administered to a cow before calving increase colostral antibodies against those specific antigens. This has been best demonstrated with vaccines that are administered to cows against neonatal diarrhea pathogens. These vaccines are designed to increase the colostral antibody concentration against specific organisms that cause diarrhea in calves, such as Escherichia coli, rotavirus, and coronavirus.26, 27, 28 Little research has been done looking at other vaccines and their impact on colostral antibodies, however. Although one study demonstrated that vaccinating cows with a modified-live viral vaccine increased colostral antibodies, a recent study with inactivated viral vaccination of cows did not show the same response. One Israeli study actually demonstrated decreased colostral antibodies when cows were vaccinated before calving. If a vaccine is being designed primarily to improve colostral transfer of antibodies, studies should be requested that demonstrate the vaccine's ability to produce the desired effect.

Maternal antibody interference revisited

One of the commonly held beliefs in neonatal immunology is that the presence of maternal antibody blocks the immune responses associated with vaccination. This has been based on vaccinating animals, followed by evaluating subsequent levels of antibody titers. It is clear from many studies that if animals are vaccinated in the presence of high levels of maternal antibody to that antigen, they may not display increased antibody titers after vaccination.32, 33 Nevertheless, recent studies have shown the formation of B-cell memory responses34, 35, 36 and cell-mediated immune responses in the face of maternal antibody when attenuated vaccines were used. Similar responses have been reported in laboratory animals as well.37, 38, 39 It is clear from these studies that maternal antibody interference of vaccines is not as absolute as once thought. The immune status of the animal, particularly against that antigen; the specific antigen; and presentation of that antigen should be considered when trying to design vaccination programs when maternal antibody may be present. In summary, work published to date (and cited previously) has demonstrated that vaccination against diseases that have a primary cell-mediated protective mechanism may be more likely to stimulate an immune response in the face of maternal antibody than those in which humoral immunity is the primary protective mechanism (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Diseases with research that has assessed maternal antibody interference in cattle

Primarily Cell-Mediated Protection: Vaccination not Blocked by Maternal AntibodyPrimary Antibody Protection: Vaccination Blocked by Maternal Antibody
BRSVBovine viral diarrhea
BHV-1Mannheimia haemolytica
Parainfluenza virusPasteurella multocida
Leptospira borgpetersennii
Pseudorabies
Diseases with research that has assessed maternal antibody interference in cattle

Impact of stress

Stress has an impact on the calf's immune system as it does in older animals. There are several factors that can affect the immune system and are unique to the neonatal animal. The calving process has a dramatic impact on the newborn's immune system because of corticosteroid release. Furthermore, the newborn has an increased number of suppressor T cells. These factors, along with others, dramatically decrease systemic immune responses for the first week of life. Recent research has demonstrated that there is actually a decrease in the immune response of neonatal calves. From birth, there is a decrease in immune responses until day 3, when they are at their lowest levels (Fig. 1 ). By day 5, these responses are back to the level of immune responses seen on the day of birth. Systemically administered vaccinations during this time should be avoided because of these decreased responses. Vaccination immediately after birth may even have undesired effects. Furthermore, other stresses should be avoided in the young calf to try and maintain immune system integrity in the immunologically frail newborn. Procedures like castration, dehorning, weaning, and movement need to be considered as stresses that have the potential to decrease immune system function temporarily.
Fig. 1

Graph illustrates the immune dysfunction present in the neonatal calf and shows diminished cytokine (interferon-γ [IFNγ]) production and blastogenic responses in the first few days after birth. CPM, counts per minute. (Data from Marcus Kehrli, DVM, PhD, Ames, IA.)

Graph illustrates the immune dysfunction present in the neonatal calf and shows diminished cytokine (interferon-γ [IFNγ]) production and blastogenic responses in the first few days after birth. CPM, counts per minute. (Data from Marcus Kehrli, DVM, PhD, Ames, IA.)

Vaccination

As discussed previously, the vaccination of the young calf is being revisited. Many different types of vaccines are routinely used in veal, dairy beef, and dairy replacement heifers in addition to branding/turnout vaccinations in beef calves. The effectiveness of these programs is attributable to an interaction among several factors, including antigen (ie, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis [IBR] versus Pasteurella haemolytica) and vaccine type (ie, modified-live or inactivated), age of the calf, presence of maternal antibody, other stress factors present at the time of vaccination, and timing of disease agent exposure. Vaccines that use the mucosal immune system have been tested and licensed for use in the young calf, including the newborn. These vaccines include modified-live vaccines; intranasal IBR/PI3 vaccines; modified-live vaccines; oral rotavirus/coronavirus vaccines; and new intranasal vaccines containing bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) types 1 and 2, bovine herpesvirus (BHV)-1, PI3 and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), or BRSV in combination with PI3. For BRSV in which limited replication occurs with systemic modified-live vaccination, intranasal administration may be the most effective route. Exact timing of early vaccination varies somewhat depending on antigen and presentation. In human immunology, times during which antigen exposure may cause a predominance of IgE production have been shown. Similar immune responses have not been demonstrated in food animals. One study has shown that initial systemic vaccination for the four primary viral diseases (BVDV, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis [IBRV], BRSV, and PI3) has little impact when administered during the 3-week-old to 5-week-old age window in dairy calves, however. The author's own work has seen the same problems with vaccination during this time. This corresponds to the time frame in which maternal T cells are disappearing from the calf.18, 21 Several other studies have looked at vaccinating calves before 3 weeks of age, with good response.28, 43, 44 In general, vaccination in the young calf should precede anticipated or historical times of disease by at least 10 days, allowing the immune system to respond before exposure. If a booster dose is required, the booster should be given at least 10 days before the expected disease occurrence. Although in its infancy, the use of vaccination programs in young food animals is gaining popularity and more research is needed to define protection and the timing required by different vaccines in the neonate further.

Summary

The neonatal immune system is a complex and interrelated system containing components from the dam and the newborn. Although the system is capable of responding and inferring varying degrees of protection, it is this combination of passive and active immunity together that provides protection to the neonate.
  29 in total

1.  Response of calves to challenge exposure with virulent bovine respiratory syncytial virus following intranasal administration of vaccines formulated for parenteral administration.

Authors:  John Ellis; Sheryl Gow; Keith West; Cheryl Waldner; Carrie Rhodes; George Mutwiri; Helene Rosenberg
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Ontogeny of circulating B lymphocytes in neonatal calves.

Authors:  D R Senogles; C C Muscoplat; P S Paul; D W Johnson
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Response of the bovine fetus to bovine viral diarrhea-mucosal disease virus.

Authors:  A P Casaro; J W Kendrick; P C Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Neonatal tolerance revisited: turning on newborn T cells with dendritic cells.

Authors:  J P Ridge; E J Fuchs; P Matzinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Immune response of pregnant cows to bovine rotavirus immunization.

Authors:  L J Saif; K L Smith; B J Landmeier; E H Bohl; K W Theil; D A Todhunter
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Intestinal absorption of maternal leucocytes by newborn lambs.

Authors:  K L Schnorr; L D Pearson
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.054

7.  Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer.

Authors:  J D Robison; G H Stott; S K DeNise
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  The influence of colostral leukocytes on the course of an experimental Escherichia coli infection and serum antibodies in neonatal calves.

Authors:  G Riedel-Caspari
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  The influence of colostral leukocytes on the immune system of the neonatal calf. IV. Effects on bactericidity, complement and interferon; synopsis.

Authors:  G Riedel-Caspari; F W Schmidt; J Marquardt
Journal:  Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1991-10

10.  Humoral immune response of the bovine fetus to in utero vaccination with attenuated bovine coronavirus.

Authors:  T P Mullaney; L E Newman; C K Whitehair
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  24 in total

1.  Effects of vaccination timing against respiratory pathogens on performance, antibody response, and health in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Thiago F Schumaher; Reinaldo F Cooke; Alice P Brandão; Kelsey M Schubach; Osvaldo A de Sousa; David W Bohnert; Rodrigo S Marques
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Zootechnical and health performance of Holstein x Gir crossbred calves.

Authors:  Maria Amélia Agnes Weiller; Evandro Schmoeller; Laura Valadão Vieira; Antônio Amaral Barbosa; Josiane de Oliveira Feijó; Cássio Cassal Brauner; Eduardo Schmitt; Marcio Nunes Corrêa; Viviane Rohrig Rabassa; Francisco Augusto Burkert Del Pino
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Alveolar macrophage functions during the transition phase to active immunity in calves1.

Authors:  Heloisa G Bertagnon; Camila F Batista; Kamila R Santos; Renata C Gomes; Jessyca B Bellinazzi; Alice Maria M P Della Libera
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 5.  Innate immunology of bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Mark R Ackermann; Rachel Derscheid; James A Roth
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  A Recombinant BCG Vaccine Is Safe and Immunogenic in Neonatal Calves and Reduces the Clinical Disease Caused by the Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Authors:  Fabián E Díaz; Mariana Guerra-Maupome; Paiton O McDonald; Daniela Rivera-Pérez; Alexis M Kalergis; Jodi L McGill
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Ante-Natal and Post-Natal Influences on Neonatal Immunity, Growth and Puberty of Calves-A Review.

Authors:  Claudia L Cardoso; Ailbhe King; Aspinas Chapwanya; Giulia Esposito
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Calf health from birth to weaning. III. housing and management of calf pneumonia.

Authors:  Ingrid Lorenz; Bernadette Earley; John Gilmore; Ian Hogan; Emer Kennedy; Simon J More
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  Neonatal mucosal immunization with a non-living, non-genetically modified Lactococcus lactis vaccine carrier induces systemic and local Th1-type immunity and protects against lethal bacterial infection.

Authors:  K Ramirez; Y Ditamo; L Rodriguez; W L Picking; M L van Roosmalen; K Leenhouts; M F Pasetti
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 7.313

10.  Dynamics of perinatal bovine leukemia virus infection.

Authors:  Gerónimo Gutiérrez; Irene Alvarez; Ramiro Merlini; Flavia Rondelli; Karina Trono
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.