Literature DB >> 19173417

Frequency difference limens of pure tones and harmonics within complex stimuli in Mongolian gerbils and humans.

Astrid Klinge1, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

Frequency difference limens (FDLs) for pure tones between 200 and 6400 Hz and for the first, the second, or the eighth harmonic of an 800 Hz complex in four Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were determined using a Go/NoGo-procedure. The 12 harmonics of the complex started either in sine phase or at a random phase. Gerbils showed very high pure tone FDLs ranging from 17.1% Weber fraction (200 Hz) to 6.7% (6400 Hz). They performed much better in detecting mistuning of a harmonic in the complex in the sine phase condition with FDLs decreasing from 0.07% for the first harmonic to 0.02% for the eighth harmonic. FDLs were about one order of magnitude higher when temporal cues were degraded by randomizing the starting phase of every component in the harmonic complex for every stimulus. These results are strikingly different from those obtained in four human subjects who needed about four times higher frequency shifts than gerbils for detecting a mistuned component in a sine phase complex and showed similar detection of mistuning in the random phase condition. The results are discussed in relation to possible processing mechanisms for pure tone frequency discrimination and for detecting mistuning in harmonic complex stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173417     DOI: 10.1121/1.3021315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Critical period for acoustic preference in mice.

Authors:  Eun-Jin Yang; Eric W Lin; Takao K Hensch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger).

Authors:  William P Shofner; Megan Chaney
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.

Authors:  Daniel E Re; Jillian J M O'Connor; Patrick J Bennett; David R Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Authors:  Joseph D Wagner; Alice Gelman; Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A Role for Auditory Corticothalamic Feedback in the Perception of Complex Sounds.

Authors:  Natsumi Y Homma; Max F K Happel; Fernando R Nodal; Frank W Ohl; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker; Ray Gonzalez; Joe Z Kang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat.

Authors:  Matthew L Richardson; François Guérit; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Mistuning detection performance of ferrets in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Natsumi Y Homma; Victoria M Bajo; Max F K Happel; Fernando R Nodal; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.