Literature DB >> 19172635

Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review.

Jemma C Chambers1, Jenny Yiend, Barbara Barrett, Tom Burns, Helen Doll, Seena Fazel, Crispin Jenkinson, Asha Kaur, Martin Knapp, Emma Plugge, Lesley Sutton, Ray Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for forensic mental health (FMH) services has been developing since the late 1990s. Are outcome measures sound enough for the evaluation tasks? AIMS: To identify, from published literature, outcome measures used in FMH research and, where feasible, assess their quality.
METHOD: A structured review was undertaken of trials and intervention studies published between 1990 and 2006. Details of outcome variables and measures were abstracted. Evidence regarding most frequently occurring outcome measures was assessed.
RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty different instruments were used to assess outcomes, incorporating 1038 distinct variables. Very little evidence could be found to support the measurement properties of commonly used instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: and implications for practice There is little consistency in the use of outcome measure in FMH research. Effort is required to reach consensus on validated outcome measures in this field in order to better inform practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19172635     DOI: 10.1002/cbm.724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health        ISSN: 0957-9664


  7 in total

1.  Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Howard Ryland; Jonathan Cook; Rob Ferris; Sarah Markham; Christian Sales; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Seena Fazel
Journal:  Psychol Crime Law       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 2.  Neurological disorders and violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on epilepsy and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Johanna Philipson; Lisa Gardiner; Rowena Merritt; Martin Grann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The clinical profile of high-risk mentally disordered offenders.

Authors:  Jenny Yiend; Mark Freestone; Maria Vazquez-Montes; Josephine Holland; Tom Burns
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Defining outcome measures of hospitalization for assessment in the Japanese forensic mental health scheme: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Akihiro Shiina; Masaomi Iyo; Yoshito Igarashi
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Risk factors for interpersonal violence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; E Naomi Smith; Zheng Chang; John Richard Geddes
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  The risks, needs and stages of recovery of a complete forensic patient cohort in an Australian state.

Authors:  Jonathon Adams; Stuart D M Thomas; Tobias Mackinnon; Damien Eggleton
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Outcomes of administrative involuntary hospitalization: A national retrospective cohort study in Japan.

Authors:  Akihiro Shiina; Aiko Sato; Masaomi Iyo; Chiyo Fujii
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.