Literature DB >> 191719

A comparison of simplified methods for lipoprotein quantification using the analytic ultracentrifuge as a standard.

F T Lindgren, A Silvers, R Jutaglr, L Layshot, D D Bradley.   

Abstract

Two simplified methods for quantitative lipoprotein analysis have been calibrated and compared with each other using analytic ultracentrifugation as a standard reference procedure. The first method was the Friedewald procedure and the second was an automated agarose gel electrophoresis system. Both procedures offer comparable quantitative lipoprotein analysis with potential for large scale screening purposes at low cost ($4.00-$5.00 per analysis). There were advantages and limitations to both procedures. The Friedwald procedure can be used on frozen sera but requires 3 ml sera. In contrast, the electrophoresis system must be used with fresh serum but requires only 50 mul serum and the electrophoretic slides may be quantitatively analyzed several years retrospectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 191719     DOI: 10.1007/bf02533347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lipids        ISSN: 0024-4201            Impact factor:   1.880


  7 in total

1.  Cardiovascular risk and use of estrogens or estrogen-progestagen combinations. Stanford three-community study.

Authors:  M P Stern; B W Brown; W L Haskell; J W Farquhar; C L Wehrle; P D Wood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Quantitative agarose gel electrophoresis of plasma lipoproteins: a simple technique and two methods for standardization.

Authors:  F T Hatch; F T Lindgren; G L Adamson; L C Jensen; A W Wong; R I Levy
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1973-06

4.  A comparison of heritable abnormal lipoprotein patterns as defined by two different techniques.

Authors:  D S Fredrickson; R I Levy; F T Lindgren
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Plasma-high-density-lipoprotein concentration and development of ischaemic heart-disease.

Authors:  G J Miller; N E Miller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Lipid and lipoprotein measurements in a normal adult American population.

Authors:  F T Lindgren; G L Adamson; L C Jenson; P D Wood
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.880

7.  Comparison of results for 13 clinical laboratory determinations with three automated analytical systems.

Authors:  E J Sampson; D D Derck; L M Demers
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.327

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effects of estrogens and progestins on high density lipoproteins.

Authors:  R M Krauss; F T Lindgren; J Wingerd; D D Bradley; S Ramcharan
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  Resolution of genetic and cultural inheritance in twin families by path analysis: application to HDL-cholesterol.

Authors:  M McGue; D C Rao; L Iselius; J M Russell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Prospective study of coronary heart disease vs. HDL2, HDL3, and other lipoproteins in Gofman's Livermore Cohort.

Authors:  Paul T Williams; Daniel E Feldman
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Effect of exercise therapy on lipid profile and oxidative stress indicators in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lorenzo A Gordon; Errol Y Morrison; Donovan A McGrowder; Ronald Young; Yeiny Terry Pena Fraser; Eslaen Martorell Zamora; Ruby L Alexander-Lindo; Rachael R Irving
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.659

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.