| Literature DB >> 18477407 |
Lorenzo A Gordon1, Errol Y Morrison, Donovan A McGrowder, Ronald Young, Yeiny Terry Pena Fraser, Eslaen Martorell Zamora, Ruby L Alexander-Lindo, Rachael R Irving.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Yoga has been shown to be a simple and economical therapeutic modality that may be considered as a beneficial adjuvant for type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated the impact of Hatha yoga and conventional physical training (PT) exercise regimens on biochemical, oxidative stress indicators and oxidant status in patients with type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18477407 PMCID: PMC2390515 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Schematic diagram representing the study design.
Frequency of treated type 2 diabetic subjects according to group, sex and age
| Group | Female | Male | Total | ||||||
| No. | % | Mean Age | No. | % | Mean Age | No. | % | Mean Age | |
| Conventional | 62 | 80.5 | 63.5 | 15 | 19.5 | 65.6 | 77 | 100.0 | 63.9 |
| Hatha yoga | 62 | 80.5 | 63.8 | 15 | 19.5 | 64.7 | 77 | 100.0 | 64.0 |
| Control | 62 | 80.5 | 63.8 | 15 | 19.5 | 62.5 | 77 | 100.0 | 63.6 |
Comparison of FBG, cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations amongconventional PT exercise, Hatha yoga exercise and control type 2 diabeticpatients over a 6-month period
| Variable/Group | Baseline | 3 Months | 6 Months |
| FBG (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 11.74 ± 0.34 | 8.71 ± 0.24**ab | 8.52 ± 0.24**ab |
| Hatha yoga | 11.84 ± 0.45 | 8.58 ± 0.44**ab | 8.35 ± 0.44**ab |
| Control | 11.77 ± 0.44 | 12.79 ± 0.37 | 10.89 ± 0.39 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 4.32 ± 0.13 | 4.29 ± 0.14**ab | 4.27 ± 0.14**ab |
| Hatha yoga | 4.39 ± 0.14 | 4.33 ± 0.16**ab | 4.33 ± 0.15**ab |
| Control | 4.37 ± 0.13 | 4.93 ± 0.14 | 5.11 ± 0.13 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 1.83 ± 1.11 | 1.78 ± 1.10 | 1.70 ± 1.11 |
| Hatha yoga | 1.83 ± 1.13 | 1.76 ± 1.14 | 1.72 ± 1.13 |
| Control | 1.81 ± 1.13 | 1.83 ± 1.12 | 1.90 ± 1.12 |
Values represent Mean ± S.E. **p < 0.0001; a: significantly different from baseline; b: significantly different from control.
Comparison of HDL, LDL and VLDL among conventional PT exercise, Hathayoga exercise and control type 2 diabetic patients over a 6-month period
| Variable/Group | Baseline | 3 Months | 6 Months |
| HDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.04 |
| Hatha yoga | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.05 |
| Control | 0.93 ± 0.93 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.04 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 3.02 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.12 |
| Hatha yoga | 3.09 ± 0.14 | 3.01 ± 0.15 | 3.01 ± 0.14 |
| Control | 3.07 ± 0.12 | 3.17 ± 0.13 | 3.24 ± 0.12 |
| VLDL (mmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.05*a |
| Hatha yoga | 0.83 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.07*a |
| Control | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.84 ± 0.06 |
Values represent Mean ± S.E. *p < 0.05; a: statistically significant different from baseline.
Comparison of MDA, PLA2 and POX concentrations among conventional PTexercise, Hatha yoga exercise and control treated type 2 diabetic patients over a6-month period
| Variable/Group | Baseline | 3 Months | 6 Months |
| MDA (nmol/L) | |||
| Conventional PT | 2.32 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.12 | 1.90 ± 0.10**a*b |
| Hatha yoga | 2.36 ± 0.20 | 2.21 ± 0.15 | 1.89 ± 0.16**a*b |
| Control | 2.35 ± 0.12 | 2.36 ± 0.12 | 2.37 ± 0.13 |
| PLA2 (IU) | |||
| Conventional PT | 1.97 ± 0.08 | 2.19 ± 0.08 | 2.29 ± 0.09 |
| Hatha yoga | 2.10 ± 0.08 | 2.12 ± 0.07 | 2.25 ± 0.07 |
| Control | 2.06 ± 0.09 | 2.16 ± 0.09 | 2.15 ± 0.09 |
| POX (nmol/mg) | |||
| Conventional PT | 2.25 ± 0.12 | 2.21 ± 0.14 | 2.34 ± 0.15 |
| Hatha yoga | 2.19 ± 0.13 | 2.20 ± 0.14 | 2.34 ± 0.13 |
| Control | 2.21 ± 0.13 | 2.23 ± 0.15 | 2.25 ± 0.16 |
Values represent Mean ± S.E. **p < 0.0001; *p < 0.05; a: significantly different from baseline; b: significantly different from control.
Comparison of the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalaseamong conventional PT exercise, Hatha yoga exercise and control type 2 diabetic patients over a 6-month period
| Variable/Group | Baseline | 3 Months | 6 Months |
| SOD (U/mL) | |||
| Conventional PT | 11.25 ± 0.86 | 11.66 ± 0.82 | 13.52 ± 0.96*a |
| Hatha yoga | 11.17 ± 1.18 | 11.64 ± 1.15 | 13.86 ± 1.11*a |
| Control | 11.01 ± 1.05 | 11.03 ± 0.98 | 10.42 ± 0.93 |
| Catalase (U/mL) | |||
| Conventional PT | 80.28 ± 5.57 | 85.44 ± 5.54 | 90.87 ± 5.13 |
| Hatha yoga | 80.36 ± 7.02 | 85.53 ± 3.77 | 91.35 ± 5.21 |
| Control | 82.10 ± 5.89 | 81.44 ± 4.67 | 82.11 ± 5.34 |
Values represent Mean ± S.E. *p < 0.05; a: significantly different from baseline.