Literature DB >> 19171276

How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation.

Matthias Zumstein1, Frederik Hahn, Atul Sukthankar, Patrick S Sussmann, Claudio Dora.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the precision of central hip arthroscopy in the assessment and treatment of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) avoiding the posterolateral portal, with its close proximity to the main arterial blood supply of the femoral head, the medial circumflex femoral artery.
METHODS: Seven human cadaveric hips underwent arthroscopic trimming of the acetabular labrum and rim along a preoperatively defined 105 degrees arc of resection for treatment of a presumed pincer-type lesion. After the arthroscopic procedure, all specimens were dissected and measured for evaluation of the location, quantity, and quality of the area undergoing resection.
RESULTS: The difference between the actual and planned arc of resection was 18.7 degrees +/- 4.7 degrees (range, 2 degrees to 34 degrees). This was mainly because of a lack of accuracy in the presumed posterior starting point (PSP), with a mean deviation of 19 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees (range, 10 degrees to 36 degrees). Correlation analysis showed that variance in the arc of resection was mainly dependent on the PSP (r = 0.739, P = .058).
CONCLUSIONS: Central hip arthroscopy is a feasible option in treating anterosuperior pincer-type FAI by use of the anterior and anterolateral portals only. This cadaveric study showed that there is a significant risk of underestimating the actual arc of resection compared with the planned arc of resection for posterosuperior pincer-type lesions because of the modest accuracy in determining the PSP of the resection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate preoperative planning and arthroscopic identification of anatomic landmarks at the acetabular side are crucial for the definition of the appropriate starting and ending points in the treatment of pincer-type FAI. Whereas anterosuperior pincer-type lesions can be addressed very precisely with our technique, the actual resection of posterosuperior lesions averaged 19 degrees less than the planned resection, which may have clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19171276     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  9 in total

1.  Preoperative three-dimensional CT predicts intraoperative findings in hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Benton E Heyworth; Mark M Dolan; Joseph T Nguyen; Neal C Chen; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Samirul Imam; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Dynamic Hip Examination for Assessment of Impingement During Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Renato Locks; Jorge Chahla; Justin J Mitchell; Eduardo Soares; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Cams and pincer impingement are distinct, not mixed: the acetabular pathomorphology of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Justin Cobb; Kartik Logishetty; Kinner Davda; Farhad Iranpour
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopic acetabular rim resection in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Roxanne M Chow; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-09-08

6.  Is hip arthroscopy cost-effective for femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  David W Shearer; Jonathan Kramer; Kevin J Bozic; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Efficacy of Osseous Abnormalities Correction with Arthroscopic Surgery in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Daniel R Camacho Alvarez; Rodrigo M Mardones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Robotic-assisted femoral osteochondroplasty is more precise than a freehand technique in a Sawbone model.

Authors:  Caroline N Park; Danyal H Nawabi; Jennifer Christopher; Michael A Conditt; Anil S Ranawat
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-17

9.  The 'upper deck view' improves visualization during acetabuloplasty without chondro-labral detachment.

Authors:  Victor Ortiz-Declet; Brian H Mu; Leslie C Yuen; David R Maldonado; Austin W Chen; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.