Literature DB >> 19170822

Selection efficiency and effective population size in Drosophila species.

N Petit1, A Barbadilla.   

Abstract

A corollary of the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution is that the efficiency of natural selection depends on effective population size. In this study, we evaluated the differences in levels of synonymous polymorphism among Drosophila species and showed that these differences can be explained by differences in effective population size. The differences can have implications for the molecular evolution of the Drosophila species, as is suggested by our results showing that the levels of codon bias and the proportion of adaptive substitutions are both higher in species with higher levels of synonymous polymorphism. Moreover, species with lower synonymous polymorphism have higher levels of nonsynonymous polymorphism and larger content of repetitive sequences in their genomes, suggesting a diminished efficiency of selection in species with smaller effective population size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19170822     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  18 in total

Review 1.  Why do species vary in their rate of molecular evolution?

Authors:  Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Effective population size and the rate and pattern of nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  Megan Woolfit
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Molecular evolution and the latitudinal biodiversity gradient.

Authors:  E J Dowle; M Morgan-Richards; S A Trewick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Larger bacterial populations evolve heavier fitness trade-offs and undergo greater ecological specialization.

Authors:  Yashraj Chavhan; Sarthak Malusare; Sutirth Dey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations.

Authors:  Raul Mendez; Miriam Fritsche; Markus Porto; Ugo Bastolla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Richard Jovelin; Alivia Dey
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  De novo assembly of mitochondrial genomes provides insights into genetic diversity and molecular evolution in wild boars and domestic pigs.

Authors:  Pan Ni; Ali Akbar Bhuiyan; Jian-Hai Chen; Jingjin Li; Cheng Zhang; Shuhong Zhao; Xiaoyong Du; Hua Li; Hui Yu; Xiangdong Liu; Kui Li
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.

Authors:  Eckart Stolle; Jonathan H Kidner; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Natural selection on functional modules, a genome-wide analysis.

Authors:  François Serra; Leonardo Arbiza; Joaquín Dopazo; Hernán Dopazo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Habitat variability correlates with duplicate content of Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Takashi Makino; Masakado Kawata
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.