Literature DB >> 1917069

Mobilized mercury in subjects with varying exposure to elemental mercury vapour.

M Molin1, A Schütz, S Skerfving, G Sällsten.   

Abstract

In a mercury mobilization test, 0.3 g of the complexing agent sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate (DMPS) was given orally to 10 workers with moderate occupational exposure to elemental mercury vapour, to 8 dentists with slight exposure, to 18 matched controls, and to 5 referents without amalgam fillings. In the workers, DMPS caused an increase in 24-h urinary mercury excretion by a factor of 10; in the dentists, 5.9; in the controls, 5.3; and in the amalgam-free referents, 3.8. Of the mercury excreted during 24 h, 59% appeared during the first 6 h. Close, albeit non-linear, associations were found between mobilized mercury and the premobilization mercury levels in plasma and urine, but not with the duration of occupational exposure or the rough estimate of the integrated function of blood levels vs time. The present data indicate that mercury mobilized after a single DMPS dose in close connection with exposure is mainly an index of recent exposure and is not significantly affected by slow body pools or long-term exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1917069     DOI: 10.1007/bf00381567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  33 in total

1.  Correlation between selenium and mercury in man following exposure to inorganic mercury.

Authors:  L Kosta; A R Byrne; V Zelenko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mercury exposure from dental fillings. I. Mercury concentrations in blood and urine.

Authors:  S Langworth; C G Elinder; A Akesson
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1988

3.  Studies on humans exposed to methyl mercury through fish consumption.

Authors:  G Birke; A G Johnels; L O Plantin; B Sjöstrand; S Skerfving; T Westermark
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1972-08

4.  Relation between mercury and selenium in pituitary glands of dental staff.

Authors:  M Nylander; J Weiner
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-10

5.  Mercury accumulation in tissues from dental staff and controls in relation to exposure.

Authors:  M Nylander; L Friberg; D Eggleston; L Björkman
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1989

6.  Tests of efficacy of antidotes for removal of methylmercury in human poisoning during the Iraq outbreak.

Authors:  T W Clarkson; L Magos; C Cox; M R Greenwood; L Amin-Zaki; M A Majeed; S F Al-Damluji
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Effect of some chelating agents on the biliary excretion of mercury. 1. Excretion kinetics and distribution of mercury in the organism.

Authors:  M Cikrt; M Tichý
Journal:  J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1980

8.  Mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase before and after amalgam removal in man.

Authors:  M Molin; B Bergman; S L Marklund; A Schütz; S Skerfving
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Mercury concentrations in the human brain and kidneys in relation to exposure from dental amalgam fillings.

Authors:  M Nylander; L Friberg; B Lind
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1987

10.  A computerized automatic apparatus for determination of mercury in biological samples.

Authors:  O Einarsson; G Lindstedt; T Bergström
Journal:  J Automat Chem       Date:  1984
View more
  9 in total

1.  Recommendations for provoked challenge urine testing.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Ruha
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-12

2.  ACMT Recommends Against Use of Post-Chelator Challenge Urinary Metal Testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-19

3.  People with high mercury uptake from their own dental amalgam fillings.

Authors:  L Barregård; G Sällsten; B Järvholm
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Clearance half life of mercury in urine after the cessation of long term occupational exposure: influence of a chelating agent (DMPS) on excretion of mercury in urine.

Authors:  G Sällsten; L Barregård; A Schütz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Robin A Bernhoft
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2011-12-22

6.  The association between amalgam dental surfaces and urinary mercury levels in a sample of Albertans, a prevalence study.

Authors:  Daniel J Dutton; Ken Fyie; Peter Faris; Ludovic Brunel; Jc Herbert Emery
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Mobilization of mercury and arsenic in humans by sodium 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonate (DMPS).

Authors:  H V Aposhian
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Inorganic mercury exposure, mercury-copper interaction, and DMPS treatment in rats.

Authors:  M Blanusa; L Prester; S Radić; B Kargacin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Mercury vapour exposure during dental student training in amalgam removal.

Authors:  Robin Warwick; Andrea O'Connor; Brianne Lamey
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.646

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.