Literature DB >> 19168267

Augmentation with silicone stabilizes proximal femur fractures: an in vitro biomechanical study.

T J van der Steenhoven1, W Schaasberg, A C de Vries, E R Valstar, R G H H Nelissen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevention of hip fracture surgery in the elderly imposes great benefit for patient care as well as for society. The incidence of contra-lateral, second hip fractures after hip fracture surgery is as high as 20%. Augmentation of the contra-lateral proximal femur with silicone femoroplasty during hip fracture surgery of the ipsilateral hip could be a new preventive strategy. This study compared the degree of dislocation after a controlled induced fracture between treated and control cadaver femora.
METHODS: Ten paired cadaver femora were randomly assigned for silicone femoroplasty and biomechanically tested for fracture load and dislocation against their native contra-lateral control. A load testing machine was used for fracture induction. All femurs were first fractured in a simulated fall configuration followed by dislocation in a "single leg stance" configuration. Dislocation was accessed using the AO-classification and measuring the Caput-Collum-Diaphysis angle.
FINDINGS: Fracture loads were approximately 10% lower in the treated group (P=0.304). Forces needed to dislocate the proximal femur fractures did not significantly differ in both groups nor did the fracture type and AO-classification. All treated femurs showed complete reposition according to Caput-Collum-Diaphysis angle after dislocation versus only two of the controls (P<0.001).
INTERPRETATION: From the results of this study we conclude silicone femoroplasty stabilizes the proximal femur by restoring hip geometry according to the Caput-Collum-Diaphysis angle after fracture. Future improvements in minimal invasive excavation and injection could make silicone femoroplasty an attractive alternative strategy in the prevention of hip fracture surgery in the growing population of low-demand, elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19168267     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

2.  Bone texture analysis of human femurs using a new device (BMA™) improves failure load prediction.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Paratte; T Amphoux; S Persohn; S Campana; W Skalli; S Paternotte; J-N Argenson; J-M Bouler; O Gagey; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Augmentation of core decompression with synthetic bone graft does not improve mechanical properties of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Samuel A Hockett; John T Sherrill; Micah Self; Simon C Mears; C Lowry Barnes; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-12-11

4.  EVALUATION OF A BONE REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUE USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Lucas Carreiro DA Silva; Nathan Drumond Vasconcelos Godinho; Amirhossein Farvardin; Mehran Armand; Ana Patrícia DE Paula
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  In vitro injection of osteoporotic cadaveric femurs with a triphasic calcium-based implant confers immediate biomechanical integrity.

Authors:  John D Stroncek; Jonathan L Shaul; Dominique Favell; Ronald S Hill; Bryan M Huber; James G Howe; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.