BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prehypertension has been recently introduced by JNC 7 as a new blood pressure (BP) category, associated with increased target-organ damage. Subclinical atherosclerosis by means of common artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) has been incompletely investigated in prehypertensive patients. The aim of our study was to assess the extent of CCA-IMT and left ventricular mass (LVM) in prehypertensive adults in comparison to normotensive and untreated hypertensive subjects. METHODS: From a total of 5221 consecutive patients screened to our Hypertension Unit we selected 896 consecutive individuals according to prespecified inclusion criteria, who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, carotid artery ultrasonographic, and echocardiographic measurements. Patients who received antihypertensive treatment during the BP monitoring were excluded. According to the office BP levels, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: normotensives (office BP <120/80 mm Hg), prehypertensives (120/80 mm Hg<or=office BP<140/90 mm Hg), and hypertensives (office BP >or=140/90 mm Hg). Statistical analyses were performed by means of 1-way ANOVA, chi(2) test, and ANCOVA. RESULTS: According to the office BP levels, the distribution of the study population was: normotensives (14.4%), prehypertensives (23.7%), and hypertensives (61.9%). Prehypertensive patients had higher CCA-IMT (P=0.038) and LVM (P=0.030) values than normotensive subjects, even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Greater CCA-IMT values were observed in hypertensive patients in comparison to prehypertensives (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Prehypertensive patients had higher CCA-IMT and LVM than their normotensive counterparts. Prehypertension status is cross-sectionally associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and target-organ damage.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Prehypertension has been recently introduced by JNC 7 as a new blood pressure (BP) category, associated with increased target-organ damage. Subclinical atherosclerosis by means of common artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) has been incompletely investigated in prehypertensivepatients. The aim of our study was to assess the extent of CCA-IMT and left ventricular mass (LVM) in prehypertensive adults in comparison to normotensive and untreated hypertensive subjects. METHODS: From a total of 5221 consecutive patients screened to our Hypertension Unit we selected 896 consecutive individuals according to prespecified inclusion criteria, who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, carotid artery ultrasonographic, and echocardiographic measurements. Patients who received antihypertensive treatment during the BP monitoring were excluded. According to the office BP levels, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: normotensives (office BP <120/80 mm Hg), prehypertensives (120/80 mm Hg<or=office BP<140/90 mm Hg), and hypertensives (office BP >or=140/90 mm Hg). Statistical analyses were performed by means of 1-way ANOVA, chi(2) test, and ANCOVA. RESULTS: According to the office BP levels, the distribution of the study population was: normotensives (14.4%), prehypertensives (23.7%), and hypertensives (61.9%). Prehypertensivepatients had higher CCA-IMT (P=0.038) and LVM (P=0.030) values than normotensive subjects, even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Greater CCA-IMT values were observed in hypertensivepatients in comparison to prehypertensives (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS:Prehypertensivepatients had higher CCA-IMT and LVM than their normotensive counterparts. Prehypertension status is cross-sectionally associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and target-organ damage.
Authors: Marcelo Perim Baldo; Mauer A Gonçalves; Daniel P Capingana; Pedro Magalhães; Amilcar B Tomé da Silva; José Geraldo Mill Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2018-06-28
Authors: Angela B S Santos; Deepak K Gupta; Natalie A Bello; Mauro Gori; Brian Claggett; Flavio D Fuchs; Amil M Shah; Josef Coresh; A Richey Sharrett; Susan Cheng; Scott D Solomon Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Erhan Tenekecioglu; Mustafa Yilmaz; Osman Can Yontar; Kemal Karaagac; Fahriye Vatansever Agca; Ahmet Tutuncu; Mustafa Kuzeytemiz; Adem Bekler; Muhammed Senturk; Ufuk Aydin; Serafettin Demir Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2014-10-15
Authors: T S Ferguson; N Younger; M K Tulloch-Reid; M B Lawrence-Wright; T E Forrester; R S Cooper; J Van den Broeck; R J Wilks Journal: West Indian Med J Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 0.171
Authors: Marina De Marco; Giovanni de Simone; Mary J Roman; Marcello Chinali; Elisa T Lee; Marie Russell; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Elaine M Urbina; Philip R Khoury; Connie McCoy; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas R Kimball; Lawrence M Dolan Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 3.738