BACKGROUND: It is unclear if physical activity (PA) can prevent or reverse frailty. We examined different doses and types of PA and their association with the onset and severity of frailty. METHODS: Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study participants (N = 2,964) were followed for 5 years, with frailty defined as a gait speed of less than 0.60 m/s and/or inability to rise from a chair without using one's arms. Individuals with one impairment were considered moderately frail and those with both severely frail. We examined PA doses of volume and intensity, activity types (eg, lifestyle vs exercise activities), and their associations with incident frailty and transition to severe frailty in those who became frail. RESULTS: Adjusted models indicated that sedentary individuals had significantly increased odds of developing frailty compared with the exercise active group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.01), whereas the lifestyle active did not. Number of diagnoses was the strongest predictor of incident frailty. In those who became frail during follow-up (n = 410), there was evidence that the sedentary (adjusted OR = 2.80; 95% CI: 0.98-8.02) and lifestyle active (adjusted OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 1.22-6.43) groups were more likely to have worsening frailty over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the strong relationship seen between comorbid conditions and onset of frailty, this observational study suggests that participation in self-selected exercise activities is independently associated with delaying the onset and the progression of frailty. Regular exercise should be further examined as a potential factor in frailty prevention for older adults.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear if physical activity (PA) can prevent or reverse frailty. We examined different doses and types of PA and their association with the onset and severity of frailty. METHODS: Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study participants (N = 2,964) were followed for 5 years, with frailty defined as a gait speed of less than 0.60 m/s and/or inability to rise from a chair without using one's arms. Individuals with one impairment were considered moderately frail and those with both severely frail. We examined PA doses of volume and intensity, activity types (eg, lifestyle vs exercise activities), and their associations with incident frailty and transition to severe frailty in those who became frail. RESULTS: Adjusted models indicated that sedentary individuals had significantly increased odds of developing frailty compared with the exercise active group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.01), whereas the lifestyle active did not. Number of diagnoses was the strongest predictor of incident frailty. In those who became frail during follow-up (n = 410), there was evidence that the sedentary (adjusted OR = 2.80; 95% CI: 0.98-8.02) and lifestyle active (adjusted OR = 2.81; 95% CI: 1.22-6.43) groups were more likely to have worsening frailty over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the strong relationship seen between comorbid conditions and onset of frailty, this observational study suggests that participation in self-selected exercise activities is independently associated with delaying the onset and the progression of frailty. Regular exercise should be further examined as a potential factor in frailty prevention for older adults.
Authors: Olivier Seynnes; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Olivier Hue; Pierre Pras; Patrick Legros; Pierre L Bernard Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: E M Simonsick; M E Lafferty; C L Phillips; C F Mendes de Leon; S V Kasl; T E Seeman; G Fillenbaum; P Hebert; J H Lemke Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M A Fiatarone; E F O'Neill; N D Ryan; K M Clements; G R Solares; M E Nelson; S B Roberts; J J Kehayias; L A Lipsitz; W J Evans Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth A Phelan; Barbara Williams; Brenda W J H Penninx; James P LoGerfo; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephanie Studenski; Linda P Fried; Gordon B Cutler; Jeremy D Walston Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan L Hughes; Katherine H Leith; David X Marquez; Gwen Moni; Huong Q Nguyen; Pankaja Desai; Dina L Jones Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2011-11-01
Authors: Jing Song; Lee A Lindquist; Rowland W Chang; Pamela A Semanik; Linda S Ehrlich-Jones; Jungwha Lee; Min-Woong Sohn; Dorothy D Dunlop Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: John A Dodson; Suzanne V Arnold; Kensey L Gosch; Thomas M Gill; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Michael W Rich; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Daniel E Forman; Frederick A Masoudi; Karen P Alexander Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Qu Tian; Kirk I Erickson; Eleanor M Simonsick; Howard J Aizenstein; Nancy W Glynn; Robert M Boudreau; Anne B Newman; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Kristine Yaffe; Tamara B Harris; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Giulia Ogliari; Simin Mahinrad; David J Stott; J Wouter Jukema; Simon P Mooijaart; Peter W Macfarlane; Elaine N Clark; Patricia M Kearney; Rudi G J Westendorp; Anton J M de Craen; Behnam Sabayan Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 8.262