Literature DB >> 19162472

Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding.

Olgun Guvench1, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Determining protein-small molecule binding affinity is a key component of present-day rational drug discovery. To circumvent the time, labor, and materials costs associated with experimental protein-small molecule binding assays, a variety of structure-based computational methods have been developed for determining protein-small molecule binding affinities. These methods can be placed in one of two classes: accurate but slow (Class 1), and fast but approximate (Class 2). Class 1 methods, which explicitly take into account protein flexibility and include an atomic-level description of solvation, are capable of quantitatively reproducing experimental protein-small molecule absolute binding free energies. However, Class 1 computational requirements make screening thousands to millions of small molecules against a protein, as required for rational drug design, infeasible for the foreseeable future. Class 2 methods, on the contrary, are sufficiently fast to perform such inhibitor screening, yet they suffer from limited descriptions of protein flexibility and solvation, which in turn limit their ability to select and rank-order small molecules by computed binding affinities. This review presents an overview of Class 1 and Class 2 methods, and avenues of research in Class 2 methods aimed at bringing them closer to Class 1 accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19162472      PMCID: PMC2671234          DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  57 in total

1.  Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions.

Authors:  Robert D Clark; Alexander Strizhev; Joseph M Leonard; James F Blake; James B Matthew
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 2.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

3.  Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening.

Authors:  Yongping Pan; Niu Huang; Sam Cho; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Charles L Brooks; Jana Khandogin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

8.  A dry ligand-binding cavity in a solvated protein.

Authors:  Johan Qvist; Monika Davidovic; Donald Hamelberg; Bertil Halle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential.

Authors:  Dian Jiao; Pavel A Golubkov; Thomas A Darden; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Ensemble-based virtual screening reveals potential novel antiviral compounds for avian influenza neuraminidase.

Authors:  Lily S Cheng; Rommie E Amaro; Dong Xu; Wilfred W Li; Peter W Arzberger; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ligand binding to protein-binding pockets with wet and dry regions.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; B J Berne; R A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Balancing target flexibility and target denaturation in computational fragment-based inhibitor discovery.

Authors:  Theresa J Foster; Alexander D MacKerell; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Conformational Transitions and Convergence of Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Mauro Lapelosa; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Large scale affinity calculations of cyclodextrin host-guest complexes: Understanding the role of reorganization in the molecular recognition process.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Peng He; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-ligand Complexes.

Authors:  John C Faver; Mark L Benson; Xiao He; Benjamin P Roberts; Bing Wang; Michael S Marshall; Matthew R Kennedy; C David Sherrill; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.507

8.  Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  T-cell epitope prediction and immune complex simulation using molecular dynamics: state of the art and persisting challenges.

Authors:  Matthew N Davies; Darren R Flower; Kanchan Phadwal; Isabel K Macdonald; Peter V Coveney; Shunzhou Wan
Journal:  Immunome Res       Date:  2010-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.