OBJECTIVES: Determine if cetuximab dose escalation to induce grade 2 rash correlates with anti-tumor activity and if sera-based markers could predict likelihood of response. METHODS: Patients with persistent/recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma received an initial dose of cetuximab 400 mg/m(2), then 250 mg/m(2) weekly for two 3-week cycles. Patients who had stable disease (SD) and <grade 2 rash were dose escalated in 75 mg/m(2) increments every 3 weeks until grade 2 rash or to a maximum weekly dose of 400 mg/m(2). Pre- and post-treatment serum samples were evaluated for potential predictive markers of response. RESULTS: One of 25 patients achieved partial remission (PR) and 9 patients had SD. The median progression free survival was 2.1 months; the 1-year survival rate was 54.8%. Rash (96%) was the most common drug-related adverse event. At first response assessment, 4 patients remained at 250 mg/m(2); 8 patients were dose-escalated to 325 mg/m(2); of these, 4 ultimately were increased to 400 mg/m(2). Patients with progressive disease (PD) were removed from the study. Ninety-two serologic markers were analyzed from 20 patients to identify markers associated with clinical activity and/or predictive of outcome. Pretreatment levels of twelve markers were significantly elevated in patients exhibiting PD versus SD or PR; however, changes in marker levels during the course of treatment were not significant indicators of response. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent cetuximab showed minimal activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with elevated levels of 12 serologic markers at baseline were more likely to have earlier disease progression.
OBJECTIVES: Determine if cetuximab dose escalation to induce grade 2 rash correlates with anti-tumor activity and if sera-based markers could predict likelihood of response. METHODS:Patients with persistent/recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma received an initial dose of cetuximab 400 mg/m(2), then 250 mg/m(2) weekly for two 3-week cycles. Patients who had stable disease (SD) and <grade 2 rash were dose escalated in 75 mg/m(2) increments every 3 weeks until grade 2 rash or to a maximum weekly dose of 400 mg/m(2). Pre- and post-treatment serum samples were evaluated for potential predictive markers of response. RESULTS: One of 25 patients achieved partial remission (PR) and 9 patients had SD. The median progression free survival was 2.1 months; the 1-year survival rate was 54.8%. Rash (96%) was the most common drug-related adverse event. At first response assessment, 4 patients remained at 250 mg/m(2); 8 patients were dose-escalated to 325 mg/m(2); of these, 4 ultimately were increased to 400 mg/m(2). Patients with progressive disease (PD) were removed from the study. Ninety-two serologic markers were analyzed from 20 patients to identify markers associated with clinical activity and/or predictive of outcome. Pretreatment levels of twelve markers were significantly elevated in patients exhibiting PD versus SD or PR; however, changes in marker levels during the course of treatment were not significant indicators of response. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent cetuximab showed minimal activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with elevated levels of 12 serologic markers at baseline were more likely to have earlier disease progression.
Authors: Faina Linkov; Alex Lisovich; Zoya Yurkovetsky; Adele Marrangoni; Lyudmila Velikokhatnaya; Brian Nolen; Matthew Winans; William Bigbee; Jill Siegfried; Anna Lokshin; Robert L Ferris Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christopher Souder; Kim Leitzel; Suhail M Ali; Laurence Demers; Dean B Evans; Hilary A Chaudri-Ross; Wolfgang Hackl; Peter Hamer; Walter Carney; Allan Lipton Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nathalie Scholler; Meghan Crawford; Alicia Sato; Charles W Drescher; Kathy C O'Briant; Nancy Kiviat; Garnet L Anderson; Nicole Urban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sergei A Moshkovskii; Marina V Serebryakova; Konstantin B Kuteykin-Teplyakov; Olga V Tikhonova; Eugene I Goufman; Victor G Zgoda; Irina N Taranets; Oleg V Makarov; Alexander I Archakov Journal: Proteomics Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Daniel G Rosen; Lin Wang; J Neeley Atkinson; Yinhua Yu; Karen H Lu; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Ingegerd Hellstrom; Samuel C Mok; Jinsong Liu; Robert C Bast Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-08-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Russell J Schilder; Michael W Sill; Roger B Lee; Tanya J Shaw; Mary K Senterman; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Zoe Miner; Barbara C Vanderhyden Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jason Konner; Russell J Schilder; Felicia A DeRosa; Scott R Gerst; William P Tew; Paul J Sabbatini; Martee L Hensley; David R Spriggs; Carol A Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Rohann J M Correa; Yudith Ramos Valdes; Teresa M Peart; Elena N Fazio; Monique Bertrand; Jacob McGee; Michel Préfontaine; Akira Sugimoto; Gabriel E DiMattia; Trevor G Shepherd Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Doris R Siwak; Mark Carey; Bryan T Hennessy; Catherine T Nguyen; Mollianne J McGahren Murray; Laura Nolden; Gordon B Mills Journal: J Oncol Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 4.375