Literature DB >> 19162048

Predicting judged similarity of natural categories from their neural representations.

Matthew Weber1, Sharon L Thompson-Schill, Daniel Osherson, James Haxby, Lawrence Parsons.   

Abstract

We report a combined behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of conceptual similarity among members of a natural category (mammals). The study examined the relationship between computed pairwise similarity of neural responses to viewed mammals (e.g. bear, camel, dolphin) and subjective pairwise similarity ratings of the same set of mammals, obtained from subjects after the scanning session. In each functional region of interest (fROI), measures of neural similarity were compared to behavioral ratings. fROIs were identified as clusters of voxels that discriminated intact versus scrambled images of mammals (no information about similarity was used to define fROIs). Neural similarity was well correlated with behavioral ratings in fROIs covering the lateral occipital complex in both hemispheres (with overlap of the fusiform and inferior temporal gyri on the right side). The latter fROIs showed greater hemodynamic response to intact versus scrambled images of mammals whereas the fROIs that failed to predict similarity showed the reverse pattern. The findings provide novel evidence that information about the fine structure of natural categories is coarsely coded in regions of the ventral visual pathway. Implications for the theory of inductive inference are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19162048      PMCID: PMC3025488          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  26 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  David D Cox; Robert L Savoy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; Fang Jiang; Hervé Abdi; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain.

Authors:  Yukiyasu Kamitani; Frank Tong
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Katrien Torfs; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits.

Authors:  Alfonso Caramazza; Bradford Z. Mahon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  28 in total

1.  A computational linguistic measure of clustering behavior on semantic verbal fluency task predicts risk of future dementia in the nun study.

Authors:  Serguei V S Pakhomov; Laura S Hemmy
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  A cortical network for the encoding of object change.

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Sarah H Solomon; Gerry T M Altmann; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Towards a framework for developing semantic relatedness reference standards.

Authors:  Serguei V S Pakhomov; Ted Pedersen; Bridget McInnes; Genevieve B Melton; Alexander Ruggieri; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Semantic Similarity and Relatedness between Clinical Terms: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Serguei Pakhomov; Bridget McInnes; Terrence Adam; Ying Liu; Ted Pedersen; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  Neural Differentiation Tracks Improved Recall of Competing Memories Following Interleaved Study and Retrieval Practice.

Authors:  J C Hulbert; K A Norman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Language networks associated with computerized semantic indices.

Authors:  Serguei V S Pakhomov; David T Jones; David S Knopman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Distributed representations in memory: insights from functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Feature diagnosticity affects representations of novel and familiar objects.

Authors:  Nina S Hsu; Margaret L Schlichting; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.