Literature DB >> 19161769

Aortic root replacement with stentless porcine xenografts: early and late outcomes in 132 patients.

Scott A LeMaire1, Susan Y Green, Kapil Sharma, Catherine K Cheung, Aryan Sameri, Peter I Tsai, Gerald Adams, Joseph S Coselli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, aortic root replacement has most commonly involved mechanical composite valve grafts, which have excellent durability but necessitate lifelong anticoagulation. Stentless porcine xenografts (bioroots) are a recently developed alternative that enable root replacement without the necessity of long-term anticoagulation. This study examined the early and late outcomes of aortic root replacement with porcine bioroots.
METHODS: Porcine bioroots were used for root replacement in 132 patients. Of these, 129 (97.7%) required graft extensions for ascending aortic replacement, and 55 (41.7%) underwent aortic arch replacement. Twenty-three operations (17.4%) were reoperations. Twenty-four patients (18.2%) had aortic dissection. Early and late outcomes were ascertained by reviewing medical records. Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were used to assess improvements in functional status. Follow-up echocardiography results were reviewed to assess bioprosthetic valve function and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction.
RESULTS: There were 10 operative deaths (7.6%), 9 of which were directly related to intraoperative ventricular failure. Nine patients (6.8%) had late valve-related complications, including 5 patients with prosthetic endocarditis (3 died), 1 annular pseudoaneurysm, and 3 sudden, unexplained deaths. Survivors' NYHA status and left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly. No structural valve dysfunction was evident during follow-up. Actuarial survival was 85.6% +/- 3.1% at 1 year and 77.8% +/- 4.8% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement with porcine xenografts can be performed with respectable early and late outcomes, even when combined with aortic arch replacement. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate long-term bioroot durability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19161769     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus.

Authors:  Paul P Urbanski; Witold Dinstak; Wilko Rents; Nicolas Heinz; Anno Diegeler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-30

Review 2.  Porcine models of muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Joshua T Selsby; Jason W Ross; Dan Nonneman; Katrin Hollinger
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2015

3.  Pseudoaneurysm formation after medtronic freestyle porcine aortic bioprosthesis implantation: a word of caution.

Authors:  Brian R Englum; Elizabeth N Pavlisko; Molly C Mack; Asvin M Ganapathi; Matthew A Schechter; Jennifer M Hanna; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Does BioGlue contribute to anastomotic pseudoaneurysm after thoracic aortic surgery?

Authors:  Wei-Guo Ma; Bulat A Ziganshin; Chang-Fa Guo; Mohammad A Zafar; Richard S Sieller; Maryann Tranquilli; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated stentless aortic bioroots.

Authors:  Davut Cekmecelioglu; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Subhasis Chatterjee; Susan Y Green; Guilherme V Silva; Jose G Díez; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

6.  Case Report and Review of Literature: Late Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection With Rupture after Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with a GORE TAG Endovascular Prosthesis.

Authors:  Frank Manetta; Bayo Ajakaiye; S Jacob Scheinerman; Pey-Jen Yu
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.