Literature DB >> 1915953

Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring.

P P Mahlstedt1, K A Probasco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the willingness of sperm donors to provide in-depth medical and psychosocial information on their application forms and to share this information with recipient couples and their offspring.
DESIGN: Sperm donors in two donor programs were asked to complete 12-page application forms. In addition to frequency tabulations of responses, chi 2 analyses were performed to compare responses from two programs.
SETTING: The two donor programs were Baylor College of Medicine Sperm Bank Program, Scott Department of Urology, Houston, Texas, and Reproductive Resources, Metairie, Louisiana. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitude toward providing in-depth medical and psychosocial information to recipient couples.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of these donors are willing to complete lengthy application forms providing medical and psychosocial information. Ninety-six percent are willing to share this information in a nonidentifying manner with recipient families. Thirty-six percent say that they will be donors if anonymity cannot be guaranteed, and 60% indicate that they will meet or provide identifying information to the child at age 18. Seventy-two percent left personal messages to their potential offspring.
CONCLUSIONS: Sperm donors are willing to provide in-depth nonidentifying information for recipient families. Permanent files with medical and psychosocial information on all donors should be developed, maintained, and made available to all recipients, whether they request donor information at the time or conception or not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Fertility Society; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1915953     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54610-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Authors:  Damian H Adams
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Beyond motivation: on what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark.

Authors:  Sebastian Mohr
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2014
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.