| Literature DB >> 19159487 |
Paul Kelly1, Jim Todd, Sandie Sianongo, James Mwansa, Henry Sinsungwe, Max Katubulushi, Michael J Farthing, Roger A Feldman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa has had a major impact on infectious disease, and there is currently great interest in the impact of HIV on intestinal barrier function. A three year longitudinal cohort study in a shanty compound in Lusaka, Zambia, carried out before anti-retroviral therapy was widely available, was used to assess the impact of HIV on susceptibility to intestinal infectious disease. We measured the incidence and seasonality of intestinal infection and diarrhoea, aggregation of disease in susceptible individuals, clustering by co-habitation and genetic relatedness, and the disease-to-infection ratio.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19159487 PMCID: PMC2640404 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Demographic and clinical characteristics of 206 study participants
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| n | 70 | 136 |
| Age (median, IQR) | 38 (31–49) | 31 (25–40) |
| Age (range) | 21–74 | 18–79 |
| HIV seropositive at baseline | 14/60 (23%) | 39/117 (33%) |
| Seroconverted to HIV during follow-up | 2 | 4 |
| CD4 count (cells/μl) if HIV positive (median, IQR) (range) | 210 (125–432) (40–929) | 299 (177–399) (51–810) |
| CD4 count (cells/μl) if HIV negative (median, IQR) (range) | 742 (583–797) (269–1184) | 812 (664–1001) (384–1623) |
| BMI (kg/m2) (median, IQR) | 19.7 (18.1–21.5) | 21.7 (19.9–24.6) |
| BMI below 18.5 kg/m2 | 25/75 (33%) | 18/124 (15%) |
| Serum retinol (μmol/l) (median, IQR) | 1.91 (1.52–2.41) | 1.62 (1.30–2.08) |
| Hygiene score (median, IQR) | 3 (2–5) | 2 (2–6) |
IQR, interquartile range; CD4, cluster differentiation antigen 4; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; BMI, body mass index. P value refers to Kruskal-Wallis test of difference between medians, or Fisher's exact test of difference between proportions.
Frequency of intestinal infection in relation to stool consistency
| Organism | Formed | Soft | Loose | Watery | p | trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 2194 | n = 2230 | n = 290 | n = 17 | |||
| 16 (0.8) | 34 (1.5) | 7 (2.4) | 0 | 0.02 | 0.004 | |
| 8 (0.4) | 4 (0.2) | 7 (2.4) | 1 (5.9) | < 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Microsporidia | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ns | |
| 16 (0.7) | 33 (1.5) | 9 (3.1) | 2 (11.8) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| 144 | 150 | 30 | 1 | ns | ||
| 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ns | ||
| 108 (4.9) | 53 (2.4) | 8 (2.8) | 0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| 35 | 25 | 2 | 0 | ns | ||
| 173 (7.9) | 138 (6.2) | 6 (2.1) | 0 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| 383 (17.5) | 326 (14.6) | 37 (12.8) | 0 | 0.007 | 0.001 | |
| Hookworm | 76 | 63 | 7 | 1 | ns | |
| 4 (0.2) | 8 (0.4) | 3 (1) | 0 | 0.1 | 0.04 | |
| 11 | 10 | 2 | 0 | ns | ||
| 212 (9.7) | 143 (6.4) | 11 (3.8) | 0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| 16 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ns | ||
| 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ns | ||
| 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | ns | ||
| 24 | 31 | 3 | 0 | ns | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | ns | ||
| 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ns | ||
| 417 | 406 | 61 | 3 | ns | ||
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ns | ||
Percentages are shown in brackets where significant differences were found. 'P' was derived by Fisher's exact test across all groups, 'trend' refers to the P value using the χ2 for trend test to detect progressive changes in frequency with trends in consistency.
Frequency of intestinal infection in relation to HIV
| Organism | HIV+ | HIV- | HIV positive | HIV positive | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 1313 | n = 2981 | CD4 < 200 | CD4 > 200 | ||
| 36 (2.7) | 18 (0.6) | < 0.001 | 25 | 6 | |
| 13 (1.0) | 7 (0.2) | 0.002 | 8 | 1 | |
| 29 (2.2) | 130 (4.4) | < 0.001 | 7 | 13 | |
| 69 (5.3) | 220 (7.4) | 0.01 | 26 | 29 | |
| 172 (13.1) | 520 (17.4) | < 0.001 | 48 | 72 | |
| 0 | 14 (0.5) | 0.008 | - | - | |
| 265 (22.7) | 465 (17.8) | 0.001 | 65 | 138 | |
Only infections which differ significantly with HIV status are shown. P values derived by Fisher's exact test.
Figure 1Seasonal variation in diarrhoea and in eight intestinal infections. The seasons (each of 2 months) are shown along the x axis (1 May, June; 2 July, August; 3 September, October; 4 November, December; 5 January, February; 6 March, April) and the incidence of that infection per 'season' on the y axis. Rainfall is November-March, so shigellosis is commoner in the dry season and aeromoniasis during the rains. Infections which are listed in Table 1 and not shown here did not display seasonality.
Frequency of intestinal infection in relation to recalled diarrhoea
| Organism | Frequency (%) in months when diarrhoea reported | Frequency (%) in months when diarrhoea not reported | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 (2.7) | 38 (1.0) | 0.006 | |
| 7 (1.7) | 13 (0.3) | 0.002 | |
| Microsporidia | 3 (0.7) | 5 (0.1) | 0.035 |
| 7 (1.7) | 47 (1.2) | ns | |
| 31 (7.6) | 249 (6.6) | ns | |
| 0 | 13 (0.3) | ns | |
| 13 (3.2) | 142 (3.8) | ns | |
| 4 (1.0) | 53 (1.4) | ns | |
| 30 (7.3) | 250 (6.6) | ns | |
| 68 (16.7) | 585 (15.4) | ns | |
| Hookworm | 14 (3.4) | 108 (2.9) | ns |
| 1 (0.3) | 12 (0.3) | ns | |
| 2 (0.5) | 16 (0.4) | ns | |
| 31 (7.6) | 291 (7.7) | ns | |
| 1 (0.3) | 23 (0.6) | ns | |
| 0 | 6 (0.2) | ns | |
| 0 | 8 (0.2) | ns | |
| 5 (1.3) | 46 (1.3) | ns | |
| 2 (0.5) | 12 (0.3) | ns | |
| 3 (0.8) | 13 (0.4) | ns | |
| 86 (23.1) | 786 (22.5) | ns | |
| 2 (0.5) | 3 (0.1) | 0.08 | |
Frequency of detection of protozoa, helminths and bacteria in stool samples submitted by study participants each month. Months of observation were categorised as with or without diarrhoea based on recall of symptoms every two weeks. P determined by Fisher's exact test. ns, not significant.
Figure 2Risk of intestinal infection and diarrhoeal disease in the whole cohort, and according to HIV status and CD4 count. Fig 2A shows the absolute risk of intestinal infection per month, irrespective of symptoms, for pathogens using the restrictive definition (see Methods), and Fig 2B shows the absolute risk of infection per month, irrespective of symptoms, using the more open definition. Fig 2C shows the percentage of intestinal infections associated with diarrhoea (i.e. disease-to-infection ratio) using the restrictive definition. Fig 2D shows the disease-to-infection ratio using the more open definition.