Literature DB >> 19159400

Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data?

Christine L Roberts1, Jane C Bell, Jane B Ford, Jonathan M Morris.   

Abstract

Administrative or population health data sets (PHDS), such as birth and hospital discharge data, are used increasingly to evaluate maternity care. Use of PHDS requires reliable identification of diagnoses and procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of the reporting of diagnoses and procedures related to childbirth in both individual and linked, birth and ICD10-coded hospital discharge data. Data from a population-based validation study of 1200 women provided the 'gold standard' for labour and delivery events and were compared with the hospital discharge and birth databases. Reporting characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) were determined for: induction, augmentation and obstruction of labour, modes of delivery (including failed instrumental delivery), episiotomy, perineal tears and repairs, and manual removal of the placenta. Differences in reporting by mode of delivery were also examined. Of the 1184 records available for review, 25% had labour induced, 25% had labour augmented and, of those who laboured, 17% had obstructed labour reported. Fourteen per cent had an elective/planned caesarean section (CS) including 2% that went into labour prior to the planned date, and 11% had an emergency, unplanned CS including 2% who had no labour. With the exception of augmentation and obstruction of labour, failed instrumental delivery and manual removal, there were high levels of accuracy for reporting of diagnoses and procedures during labour and delivery. There were no significant differences in reporting by mode of delivery. The findings suggest that PHDS-reported induction of labour, mode of delivery, and 3rd and 4th degree tears and repairs can be reliably used to evaluate maternity care. Consistency in reporting in birth and hospital discharge data from different countries and over time suggests the findings are likely to be generalisable to high-income countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159400     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00980.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  46 in total

1.  Childhood outcomes following preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM): a population-based record linkage cohort study.

Authors:  C L Roberts; P Wagland; S Torvaldsen; J R Bowen; J P Bentley; J M Morris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Meghana Limaye; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer S Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Episiotomy rate in Vietnamese-born women in Australia: support for a change in obstetric practice in Viet Nam.

Authors:  Anh T Trinh; Amina Khambalia; Amanda Ampt; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Assessing the Accuracy of Reporting of Maternal Red Blood Cell Transfusion at Birth Reported in Routinely Collected Hospital Data.

Authors:  Jillian A Patterson; Sally Francis; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

6.  Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Recurrence of breech presentation in consecutive pregnancies.

Authors:  J B Ford; C L Roberts; N Nassar; W Giles; J M Morris
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Fiona Bragg; David A Cromwell; Leroy C Edozien; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Tahir A Mahmood; Allan Templeton; Jan H van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 9.  Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Marian Knight; William M Callaghan; Cynthia Berg; Sophie Alexander; Marie-Helene Bouvier-Colle; Jane B Ford; K S Joseph; Gwyneth Lewis; Robert M Liston; Christine L Roberts; Jeremy Oats; James Walker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Record linkage to obtain birth outcomes for the evaluation of screening biomarkers in pregnancy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Samantha J Lain; Charles S Algert; Vitomir Tasevski; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.