Literature DB >> 19159160

Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed.

Amanda M Seed1, Josep Call, Nathan J Emery, Nicola S Clayton.   

Abstract

The trap-tube problem is difficult for chimpanzees to solve; in several studies only 1 to 2 subjects learn the solution. The authors tested eight chimpanzees on a non-tool-using version of the problem to investigate whether the inclusion of a tool in previous tests of the trap problem may have masked the ability of chimpanzees to solve it. All eight learned to avoid the trap, in 40 to 100 trials. One transferred to two tasks that had no visual cue in common. The authors examined the performance of 15 chimpanzees on a new task in a 2 x 2 design: seven had experience on the two-trap box, eight had not; half of each group was tested with a tool, half without one. An ANOVA revealed a significant effect of tool-inclusion and experience (p < .05). Our results show that including a tool in the trap problem profoundly affects the ability of chimpanzees to solve it. With regard to what the chimpanzees had learned, the results support the notion that rather than using the available stimuli as arbitrary cues, the subjects had encoded information about functional properties. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159160     DOI: 10.1037/a0012925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  28 in total

1.  Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks.

Authors:  Christopher D Bird; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  If at first you don't succeed... Studies of ontogeny shed light on the cognitive demands of habitual tool use.

Authors:  E J M Meulman; A M Seed; J Mann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Cognition in the wild: exploring animal minds with observational evidence.

Authors:  R W Byrne; L A Bates
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Eurasian jays predict the food preferences of their mates.

Authors:  Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  More but not less uncertainty makes adult humans' tool selections more similar to those reported with crows.

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Advancing Behavior Analysis in Zoos and Aquariums.

Authors:  Terry L Maple; Valerie D Segura
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2014-08-19

8.  Task-specific modulation of adult humans' tool preferences: number of choices and size of the problem.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; Thomas J Gross; Francisco J Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Chimpanzee 'folk physics': bringing failures into focus.

Authors:  Amanda Seed; Eleanor Seddon; Bláthnaid Greene; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.