Literature DB >> 22927573

Chimpanzee 'folk physics': bringing failures into focus.

Amanda Seed1, Eleanor Seddon, Bláthnaid Greene, Josep Call.   

Abstract

Differences between individuals are the raw material from which theories of the evolution and ontogeny of cognition are built. For example, when 4-year-old children pass a test requiring them to communicate the content of another's falsely held belief, while 3-year-olds fail, we know that something must change over the course of the third year of life. In the search for what develops or evolves, the typical route is to probe the extents and limits of successful individuals' ability. Another is to focus on those that failed, and find out what difference or lack prevented them from passing the task. Recent research in developmental psychology has harnessed individual differences to illuminate the cognitive mechanisms that emerge to enable success. We apply this approach to explaining some of the failures made by chimpanzees when using tools to solve problems. Twelve of 16 chimpanzees failed to discriminate between a complete and a broken tool when, after being set down, the ends of the broken one were aligned in front of them. There was a correlation between performance on this aligned task and another in which after being set down, the centre of both tools was covered, suggesting that the limiting factor was not the representation of connection, but memory or attention. Some chimpanzees that passed the aligned task passed a task in which the location of the broken tool was never visible but had to be inferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22927573      PMCID: PMC3427557          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  37 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross; J Watson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Two-year-olds' search strategies and visual tracking in a hidden displacement task.

Authors:  Samantha C Butler; Neil E Berthier; Rachel K Clifton
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-07

3.  Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability.

Authors:  Stephanie M Carlson; Louis J Moses; Laura J Claxton
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2004-04

4.  Is looking good enough or does it beggar belief?

Authors:  Bruce M Hood
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-09

5.  Psychology. Infants' insight into the mind: how deep?

Authors:  Josef Perner; Ted Ruffman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a 'theory of mind'.

Authors:  Derek C Penn; Daniel J Povinelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Working memory.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Predicting the outcomes of physical events: two-year-olds fail to reveal knowledge of solidity and support.

Authors:  B Hood; S Carey; S Prasada
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

Review 10.  Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives.

Authors:  Alex Thornton; Dieter Lukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  23 in total

1.  Does absolute brain size really predict self-control? Hand-tracking training improves performance on the A-not-B task.

Authors:  S A Jelbert; A H Taylor; R D Gray
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Brandon Tinklenberg; Josep Call; Amanda M Seed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Animal minds: from computation to evolution.

Authors:  Alex Thornton; Nicola S Clayton; Uri Grodzinski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Biological and artificial cognition: what can we learn about mechanisms by modelling physical cognition problems using artificial intelligence planning techniques?

Authors:  Jackie Chappell; Nick Hawes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  What is comparable in comparative cognition?

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Stephen J Rossiter; Peter Skorupski; Chrisantha Fernando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Task-specific modulation of adult humans' tool preferences: number of choices and size of the problem.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; Thomas J Gross; Francisco J Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 8.  Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness.

Authors:  Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Comparing chimpanzees' preparatory responses to known and unknown future outcomes.

Authors:  Megan L Lambert; Mathias Osvath
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.