Literature DB >> 19158561

Characterization of the thinnest point of the cornea compared with the central corneal thickness in normal subjects.

Florian Rüfer1, Sebastian Sander, Alexa Klettner, Adjoa Frimpong-Boateng, Carl Erb.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For ongoing progress in refractive surgery, exact knowledge about the anatomical properties of the cornea is useful. Thus, the aim of the study was to characterize the thinnest point of the cornea compared with the central corneal thickness in normal subjects and to investigate with regard to influencing factors such as sex, age, refraction, and intraocular pressure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The central corneal thickness and the thinnest point of the cornea were determined with the Orbscan II in 390 white normal subjects. Difference between the 2 eyes, influence of sex, and measuring repetition accuracy were tested for statistical significance with t tests, and the influence of age was tested with nonparametrical test methods.
RESULTS: In the right eyes, the mean central corneal thickness was 548 +/- 37 microm and the thinnest point 537 +/- 37 microm. In the left eyes, the mean central corneal thickness was 547 +/- 37 microm and the thinnest point 535 +/- 39 microm. The difference between the central corneal thickness and the thinnest point was found to be significant in both eyes in paired t test (P > 0.001). No influence of sex, refraction, and intraocular pressure on the thickness of the thinnest point of the cornea could be observed. The difference between central corneal thickness and thickness at the thinnest point was not subject to a statistically significant influence of age.
CONCLUSIONS: In the calculation of the residual corneal layer thickness in laser refractive surgery, the thinnest point of the cornea should form the basis.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158561     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181861c29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  7 in total

1.  [Difference and distance between the central and thinnest points of the cornea: impact of refractive state, age and ocular side].

Authors:  J Steinberg; C Kohl; T Katz; G Richard; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Scanning-slit topography in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  László Módis; Gábor Németh; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsa Flaskó; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography.

Authors:  Faik Orucoglu; Ebru Toker
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparison of Fourier-Domain and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Measurement of Thinnest Corneal Thickness in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Chunxiao Wang; Xueying Xia; Bishan Tian; Shiyou Zhou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Corneal Thickness Profile and Associations in Chinese Children Aged 7 to 15 Years Old.

Authors:  Yingyan Ma; Xiaofeng Zhu; Xiangui He; Lina Lu; Jianfeng Zhu; Haidong Zou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The relationship of central corneal thickness with the status of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Handan Canan; Nedime Sahinoglu-Keskek; Rana Altan-Yaycioglu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Comparison of corneal thickness in patients with dry eye disease using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujimoto; Takenori Inomata; Yuichi Okumura; Nanami Iwata; Kenta Fujio; Atsuko Eguchi; Ken Nagino; Hurramhon Shokirova; Maria Karasawa; Akira Murakami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.